Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: [F]Fluoroestradiol ([F]FES) PET/CT has been proposed as a tool for detecting the oestrogen receptor density in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC) non-invasively across all disease localizations. However, its diagnostic potential in terms of the detection rate (DR) of metastases is unclear. In this study, we pitted this method against [F]FDG PET/CT and tried to identify predictors of the diagnostic superiority of the [F] FES-based method.
Materials And Methods: From a multicentre database, we enrolled all patients with metastatic BC who had undergone both [F]FES PET/CT and [F]FDG PET/CT. Two readers assessed both images independently and used a patient-based (PBA) and lesion-based analysis (LBA) to calculate the DR. Pathology-related and clinical factors were tested as predictors of [F]FES PET/CT superiority using a multivariate model.
Results: 92 patients, bearing a total of 2678 metastases, were enrolled. On PBA, the DR of [F]FDG and [F]FES PET/CT was 97% and 86%, respectively (p = 0.018). On LBA, the [F]FES method proved more sensitive than [F]FDG PET/CT in lymph nodes, bone, lung and soft tissue (p < 0.01). This greater sensitivity was associated with lobular histology, both on PBA (Odds Ratio (OR) 3.4, 95%CI 1.0-12.3) and on LBA (OR 4.4, 95%CI 1.2-16.1 for lymph node metastases and OR 3.29, 95%CI 1.1-10.2 for bone localizations).
Conclusions: The overall DR of [F]FES PET/CT appears to be lower than that of [F]FDG PET/CT on PBA. However, the [F]FES method, if positive, can identify more lesions than [F]FDG at most sites. The higher sensitivity of [F]FES PET/CT was associated with lobular histology.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06173-9 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!