Severe Hypersensitivity Reactions at Biosimilar versus Originator Rituximab Treatment Initiation, Switch and Over Time: A Cohort Study on the French National Health Data System.

BioDrugs

EPI-PHARE, French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM) and French National Health Insurance (CNAM), 143-147 Boulevard Anatole France, 93285, Saint-Denis, France.

Published: May 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Biosimilar rituximab products were introduced in 2017, and French pharmacovigilance reports indicated a rise in severe hypersensitivity reactions associated with their use compared to the original drug.
  • This study aimed to investigate the real-world risk of hypersensitivity reactions in patients using either biosimilar or originator rituximab, analyzing data from the French National Health Data System from 2017 to 2021.
  • The findings revealed no significant difference in hospitalization rates for hypersensitivity reactions between biosimilar and originator users, suggesting that biosimilars do not carry an increased risk when initiating treatment or switching from the original product.

Article Abstract

Background: Biosimilar products of rituximab came to market in 2017. French pharmacovigilance centers have highlighted an excess of case reports of severe hypersensitivity reactions related to their use compared with the originator product.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the real-world association between biosimilar versus originator rituximab injections and hypersensitivity reactions, among initiators and switchers, at first injection and over time.

Methods: The French National Health Data System was used to identify all rituximab users between 2017 and 2021. A first cohort consisted of patients who initiated rituximab (originator or biosimilar), while a second cohort consisted of originator-to-biosimilar switchers, matched on age, sex, deliveries history, and pathology, with one or two patients still receiving the originator product. The event of interest was defined as a hospitalization for anaphylactic shock or serum sickness following a rituximab injection.

Results: A total of 91,894 patients were included in the initiation cohort-17,605 (19%) with the originator product and 74,289 (81%) with a biosimilar. At initiation, 86/17,605 (0.49%) and 339/74,289 (0.46%) events occurred in the originator and biosimilar groups, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio of biosimilar exposure associated with the event was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-1.34), and the adjusted hazard ratio for biosimilar versus originator exposure was 1.15 (95% CI 0.93-1.42), showing no increased risk of event with biosimilar use at first injection, and over time. 17,123 switchers were matched to 24,659 non-switchers. No association was found between switch to biosimilars and occurrence of the event.

Conclusion: Our study does not support any association between exposure to rituximab biosimilars versus originator and hospitalization for a hypersensitivity reaction, either at initiation, at switch, or over time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195743PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-023-00584-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

versus originator
16
hypersensitivity reactions
12
biosimilar versus
12
biosimilar
9
originator
9
severe hypersensitivity
8
originator rituximab
8
initiation switch
8
switch time
8
french national
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!