A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Dosimetric comparison of robust angles in carbon-ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to assess how different beam angles affect the robustness and linear energy transfer (LET) in carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) for prostate cancer.
  • It involved 10 patients receiving a total dose of 51.6 Gy across 12 treatments, comparing five beam plans with various angle combinations.
  • Results indicated that using oblique beam angles resulted in better dose sparing for the rectum and improved robustness compared to traditional lateral beam angles, especially under conditions of set-up uncertainty.

Article Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the plan robustness at various beam angles. Hence, the influence of the beam angles on robustness and linear energy transfer (LET) was evaluated in gantry-based carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) for prostate cancer. 10 patients with prostate cancer were considered, and a total dose of 51.6 Gy (Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was prescribed for the target volume in 12 fractions. Five beam field plans comprising two opposed fields with different angle pairs were characterized. Further, dose parameters were extracted, and the RBE-weighted dose and LET values for all angle pairs were compared. All plans considering the setup uncertainty satisfied the dose regimen. When a parallel beam pair was used for perturbed scenarios to take into account set-up uncertainty in the anterior direction, the LET clinical treatment volume (CTV) standard deviation was 1.5 times higher, and the standard deviation of RBE-weighted CTV was 7.9 times higher compared to an oblique pair. The oblique beam fields were superior in terms of dose sparing for the rectum compared to the dose distribution using two conventional lateral opposed fields for prostate cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9978491PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1054693DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prostate cancer
16
carbon-ion radiation
8
radiation therapy
8
beam angles
8
opposed fields
8
angle pairs
8
standard deviation
8
times higher
8
dose
6
beam
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!