AI Article Synopsis

  • There is no clear agreement on whether surgical or non-surgical treatment is better for Achilles tendon ruptures, with recent studies showing similar outcomes for both methods.
  • This study analyzed data from over 31,000 patients to compare reoperation rates, complications, and treatment costs for both treatment approaches over time.
  • Results indicated that the surgical group had a higher rate of complications within the first 30 days, while costs were generally higher for surgical treatment in the short term, but similar by the five-year mark.

Article Abstract

Background: No consensus exists regarding the superiority of operative versus nonoperative management for Achilles tendon ruptures, as multiple randomized controlled trials conducted since the advent of early mobilization protocols have found outcomes for these 2 interventions to be more similar than were previously held.

Purpose: To use a large national database to (1) compare reoperation and complication rates between operative and nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures and (2) evaluate trends in treatment and cost over time.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: The MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database was used to identify an unmatched cohort of 31,515 patients who sustained primary Achilles tendon ruptures between 2007 and 2015. Patients were stratified into operative and nonoperative treatment groups, and a propensity score-a matching algorithm-was used to establish a matched cohort of 17,996 patients (n = 8993 per treatment group). Reoperation rates, complications, and aggregate treatment costs were compared between groups with an alpha level of .05. A number needed to harm (NNH) was calculated from the absolute risk difference in complications between cohorts.

Results: The operative cohort experienced a significantly larger total number of complications within 30 days of injury (1026 vs 917; = .0088). The absolute increase in cumulative risk was 1.2% with operative treatment, which resulted in an NNH of 83. Neither 1-year (1.1% [operative] vs 1.3% [nonoperative]; = .1201) nor 2-year reoperation rates (1.9% [operative] vs 2% [nonoperative]; = .2810) were significantly different. Operative care was more expensive than nonoperative care at 9 months and 2 years after injury; however, there was no difference in cost between treatments at 5 years. Before matching, the rate of surgical repair for Achilles tendon rupture remained stable, from 69.7% to 71.7% between 2007 and 2015, indicating little change in practice in the United States.

Conclusion: Results indicated no differences in reoperation rates between operative and nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures. Operative management was associated with an increased risk of complications and higher initial costs, which dissipated over time. Between 2007 and 2015 the proportion of Achilles tendon ruptures managed operatively remained similar despite increasing evidence that nonoperative management of Achilles tendon rupture may provide equivalent outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9974620PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231152904DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

achilles tendon
32
tendon ruptures
20
nonoperative treatment
12
tendon rupture
12
nonoperative management
12
management achilles
12
operative nonoperative
12
2007 2015
12
reoperation rates
12
operative
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!