Background: Many studies investigating the cortisol awakening response (CAR) suffer from low adherence to the study protocol as well as from the lack of precise and objective methods for assessing the awakening and saliva sampling times which leads to measurement bias on CAR quantification.

Methods: To address this issue, we have developed "CARWatch", a smartphone application that aims to enable low-cost and objective assessment of saliva sampling times as well as to concurrently increase protocol adherence. As proof-of-concept study, we assessed the CAR of N = 117 healthy participants (24.2 ± 8.7 years, 79.5% female) on two consecutive days. During the study, we recorded awakening times (AW) using self-reports, the CARWatch application, and a wrist-worn sensor, and saliva sampling times (ST) using self-reports and the CARWatch application. Using combinations of different AW and ST modalities, we derived different reporting strategies and compared the reported time information to a Naive sampling strategy assuming an ideal sampling schedule. Additionally, we compared the AUC, computed using information from different reporting strategies, against each other to demonstrate the effect of inaccurate sampling on the CAR.

Results: The use of CARWatch led to a more consistent sampling behavior and reduced sampling delay compared to self-reported saliva sampling times. Additionally, we observed that inaccurate saliva sampling times, as resulting from self-reports, were associated with an underestimation of CAR measures. Our findings also revealed potential error sources for inaccuracies in self-reported sampling times and showed that CARWatch can help in better identifying, and possibly excluding, sampling outliers that would remain undiscovered by self-reported sampling.

Conclusion: The results from our proof-of-concept study demonstrated that CARWatch can be used to objectively record saliva sampling times. Further, it suggests its potential of increasing protocol adherence and sampling accuracy in CAR studies and might help to reduce inconsistencies in CAR literature resulting from inaccurate saliva sampling. For that reason, we published CARWatch and all necessary tools under an open-source license, making it freely accessible to every researcher.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2023.106073DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

saliva sampling
28
sampling times
28
sampling
16
times self-reports
12
smartphone application
8
cortisol awakening
8
awakening response
8
times
8
protocol adherence
8
proof-of-concept study
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!