AI Article Synopsis

  • The development of Korean Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines (KM-CPGs) is essential for standardizing practices and ensuring they are evidence-based, reflecting a shift towards integrating research into complementary and alternative medicine.
  • A systematic process involves reviewing existing guidelines, formulating key clinical questions, and following international standards for evidence appraisal, ensuring the quality of KM-CPGs is upheld through multiple evaluations.
  • Successful implementation of evidence-based practices in Korean Medicine requires collaboration among various stakeholders, including clinicians, researchers, and policymakers, to effectively translate research findings into clinical applications.

Article Abstract

Background: Since evidence-based medicine has been pursued in complementary and alternative medicine, the clinical practice guideline (CPG) has become a key factor in providing standardized and validated practices in Korean Medicine (KM). We aimed to review the current status and characteristics of the development, dissemination, and implementation of KM-CPGs.

Methods: We searched KM-CPGs and relevant publication web-based databases. We organized the searching results focused on the year of publications and the development programs to show which and how KM-CPGs have been development. We also reviewed the manuals for KM-CPG development to introduce concise characteristics of the KM-CPGs published in Korea.

Results: The KM-CPGs have been developed according to manuals and standard templates for developing evidence-based KM-CPGs. First, CPG developers reviews the previously published CPGs for a clinical condition of interest and plans the CPG development. After finalizing the key clinical questions, the evidence is searched, selected, appraised, and analyzed following the internationally standardized methods. The quality of the KM-CPGs is controlled by a tri-step appraisal process. Second, the CPGs were submitted for the appraisal of the KM-CPG Review and Evaluation Committee. The committee evaluates the CPGs according to the AGREE II tool. Finally, the Steering Committee of the KoMIT project reviews the entire process of developing the CPGs and confirms it for public disclosure and dissemination.

Conclusion: Evidence-based KM from research to practice can be achieved with the attention and effort of multidisciplinary entities such as clinicians, practitioners, researchers, and policymakers for the CPGs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9971282PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2023.100924DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical practice
8
korean medicine
8
complementary alternative
8
alternative medicine
8
development
6
km-cpgs
6
medicine
5
cpgs
5
development clinical
4
practice guidelines
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!