Self-regulation often refers to the executive influence of cognitive resources to alter prepotent responses. The ability to engage cognitive resources as a form of executive process emerges and improves in the preschool-age years while the dominance of prepotent responses, such as emotional reactions, begins to decline from toddlerhood onward. However, little direct empirical evidence addresses the timing of an age-related increase in executive processes and a decrease in age-related prepotent responses over the course of early childhood. To address this gap, we examined children's individual trajectories of change in prepotent responses and executive processes over time. At four age points (24 months, 36 months, 48 months, and 5 years), we observed children (46% female) during a procedure in which mothers were busy with work and told their children they had to wait to open a gift. Prepotent responses included children's interest in and desire for the gift and their anger about the wait. Executive processes included children's use of focused distraction, which is the strategy considered optimal for self-regulation in a waiting task. We examined individual differences in the timing of age-related changes in the proportion of time spent expressing a prepotent response and engaging executive processes using a series of nonlinear (generalized logistic) growth models. As hypothesized, the average proportion of time children expressed prepotent responses decreased with age, and the average proportion of time engaged in executive processes increased with age. Individual differences in the developmental timing of changes in prepotent responses and executive process were correlated = .35 such that the timing of decrease in proportion of time expressing prepotent responses was coupled with the timing of increase in proportion of time engaging executive processes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9974174PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01650254221111788DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prepotent responses
32
executive processes
24
proportion time
20
executive
9
prepotent
9
developmental timing
8
early childhood
8
cognitive resources
8
responses
8
executive process
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • - The study explores how the brain processes stopping behaviors when faced with external signals, focusing on the pathways involved in this response inhibition.
  • - Researchers utilized neuroimaging techniques and brain stimulation to map out a four-step processing pathway that starts from the visual cortex and moves through various brain regions before reaching motor control areas.
  • - Findings highlight the crucial roles of specific areas within the insular and prefrontal cortices, revealing how these regions communicate to efficiently inhibit responses, establishing a linked circuit: V1→daINS→vpIFC/aIFC→BG/M1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * However, they make more errors on 'No-Go' signals, indicating that competition enhances quick responses at the expense of proper inhibition.
  • * The increase in errors is linked to personality traits like competitiveness and motor impulsivity, suggesting competition impacts motor control through both behavioral bias and reduced ability to distinguish between response types.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cognitive control is engaged by working memory processes and high-demand situations like antisaccade, where one must suppress a prepotent response. While it is known to be supported by the frontoparietal control network, how intra- and interareal dynamics contribute to cognitive control processes remains unclear. -Methyl-d-aspartate glutamate receptors (NMDARs) play a key role in prefrontal dynamics that support cognitive control.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Executive functions involved in thought suppression: An attempt to integrate research in two paradigms.

Conscious Cogn

October 2024

SWPS University, Department of Psychology in Krakow, Jana Pawła II 39A, 31-864 Krakow, Poland. Electronic address:

There are two main thought suppression research paradigms: the White Bear and Think/No-Think paradigms. In Think/No-Think research, thought suppression is effective and is considered to be mediated by prepotent response inhibition. Conversely, in White Bear studies, thought suppression is counterproductive and appears to engage resistance to proactive interference.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!