AI Article Synopsis

  • During the COVID-19 pandemic, principal investigators (PIs) faced challenges in managing research operations due to stay-at-home orders, requiring them to prioritize personal and personnel risks alongside work-life stressors.
  • A survey of 930 NIH and NSF-funded PIs revealed that while most prioritized the well-being of their research teams and found more facilitators than barriers, early-career faculty reported higher stress and career concerns compared to senior faculty.
  • Women PIs expressed greater interpersonal concerns and higher stress levels than their male counterparts, highlighting underlying disparities in decision-making and stress during the pandemic, which can inform future research policies and crisis management strategies.

Article Abstract

At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, stay-at-home orders disrupted normal research operations. Principal investigators (PIs) had to make decisions about conducting and staffing essential research under unprecedented, rapidly changing conditions. These decisions also had to be made amid other substantial work and life stressors, like pressures to be productive and staying healthy. Using survey methods, we asked PIs funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation (N = 930) to rate how they prioritized different considerations, such as personal risks, risks to research personnel, and career consequences, when making decisions. They also reported how difficult they found these choices and associated symptoms of stress. Using a checklist, PIs indicated those factors in their research environments that made their decisions easier (i.e., facilitators) or more difficult (i.e., barriers) to make. Finally, PIs also indicated how satisfied they were with their decisions and management of research during the disruption. Descriptive statistics summarize PIs' responses and inferential tests explore whether responses varied by academic rank or gender. PIs overall reported prioritizing the well-being and perspectives of research personnel, and they perceived more facilitators than barriers. Early-career faculty, however, rated concerns about their careers and productivity as higher priorities compared to their senior counterparts. Early-career faculty also perceived greater difficulty and stress, more barriers, fewer facilitators, and had less satisfaction with their decisions. Women rated several interpersonal concerns about their research personnel more highly than men and reported greater stress. The experience and perceptions of researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic can inform policies and practices when planning for future crises and recovering from the pandemic.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9980856PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00430-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

covid-19 pandemic
12
making decisions
8
decisions conducting
8
pis indicated
8
early-career faculty
8
decisions
7
pis
5
principal investigators'
4
investigators' priorities
4
priorities perceived
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!