Purpose: To systematically review the current literature regarding the indications, techniques, and outcomes after 2-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Methods: A literature search was performed using SCOPUS, PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement. Inclusion criteria was limited to Level I-IV human studies reporting on indications, surgical techniques, imaging, and/or clinical outcomes of 2-stage revision ACLR.

Results: Thirteen studies with 355 patients treated with 2-stage revision ACLR were identified. The most commonly reported indications were tunnel malposition and tunnel widening, with knee instability being the most common symptomatic indication. Tunnel diameter threshold for 2-stage reconstruction ranged from 10 to 14 mm. The most common grafts used for primary ACLR were bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, hamstring graft, and LARS (polyethylene terephthalate) synthetic graft. The time elapsed from primary ACLR to the first stage surgery ranged from 1.7 years to 9.7 years, whereas the time elapsed between the first and second stage ranged from 21 weeks to 13.6 months. Six different bone grafting options were reported, with the most common being iliac crest autograft, allograft bone dowels, and allograft bone chips. During definitive reconstruction, hamstring autograft and BPTB autograft were the most commonly used grafts. Studies reporting patient-reported outcome measures showed improvement from preoperative to postoperative levels in Lysholm, Tegner, and objective International Knee and Documentation Committee scores.

Conclusions: Tunnel malpositioning and widening remain the most common indications for 2-stage revision ACLR. Bone grafting is commonly reported using iliac crest autograft and allograft bone chips and dowels, whereas hamstring autograft and BPTB autograft were the most used grafts during the second-stage definitive reconstruction. Studies showed improvements from preoperative to postoperative levels in commonly used patient reported outcomes measures.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level I, III, and IV studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.02.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

2-stage revision
16
bptb autograft
12
allograft bone
12
revision anterior
8
anterior cruciate
8
cruciate ligament
8
ligament reconstruction
8
systematic review
8
outcomes 2-stage
8
studies reporting
8

Similar Publications

Outcomes and Complications of 2-Stage Versus 3-Stage Paramedian Forehead Flaps.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

March 2025

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Objective: This study aims to explore outcomes among 2-stage paramedian forehead flaps (PFFs), 3-stage PFFs, and PFFs undergoing accelerated pedicle takedown.

Study Design: A retrospective review.

Setting: A tertiary care institution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Autologous or allograft bone grafting is commonly used for bone restoration in the setting of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction owing to bone loss or malpositioned or osteolytic tunnels. For significant defects, staged procedures with initial bone grafting to the femoral and/or tibial tunnels is occasionally required. In this setting, allograft shows variable rates and quality of healing and can incur increased expense.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A 2-stage protocol is standard of care treatment in the United States for chronic periprosthetic joint infection of the knee. While many patients benefit from insertion of an articulating spacer, there are instances in which this is not feasible, and a static spacer is indicated. However, many static spacer techniques risk instability and lack durability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may present a challenge as a result of several factors, including malpositioned bone tunnels, tunnel osteolysis, and the presence of previous hardware. In addition, concomitant pathology, specifically meniscal and cartilaginous injuries, may be present and should be addressed to minimize the risk of re-rupture. Revision ACLR and treatment of accompanying injuries can be performed either as a 1-stage or 2-stage procedure, yet the latter may increase surgical risk for the patient and extend recovery time.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This video article describes the use of a bone-anchored prosthesis in patients with high above-the-knee amputations resulting in short residual limbs, most typically from trauma, cancer, infections, or dysvascular disease. The use of a socket prosthesis is usually unsuccessful in patients with a high transfemoral amputation because such prostheses have an unstable connection and often require additional waist belts for better attachment to the short residual limb. In most cases, a bone-anchored prosthesis results in substantial improvements in wear time, mobility, and quality of life in these patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!