A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Assessing the feasibility, usability and acceptability of the platform among individuals in outpatient buprenorphine treatment: Lessons learned from a pilot randomized controlled trial. | LitMetric

Background: Increasing buprenorphine/naloxone (B/N) access for opioid use disorder (OUD) is essential yet ensuring adherence and preventing diversion remains challenging. This study examines the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of , a mobile platform integrating motivational coaching, adherence monitoring, and electronic dispensing during office-based B/N treatment.

Methods: In this multi-site randomized controlled trial, provided coaching and supervised self-administration of B/N by mobile recovery coaches (MRCs) via videoconference. Referred adults (ages 18-65) with OUD were randomized to 1) 42-days of adjunctive treatment ( = 13) or 2) a standard care control group ( = 14).

Results: The randomized sample was 63% female and 100% White. Twelve of 13 participants completed at least one MRC session. The mean system usability score reported by participants was 78.4 ( = 12). Participants indicated they would recommend to a friend (mean= 4.1 of 5), and that the dispenser (4.1 of 5) and videoconferencing (4.2 of 5) were easy to use. The MRC component had the highest acceptability (4.4 of 5). MRCs observed B/N self-administration for an average of 64.3% of the required study days (men: 68.9%; women: 57.9%). On average, men ( = 4) met with MRCs on 32±14 days versus 47±6 days for women ( = 8). Exploratory analyses did not show significant differences between intervention and control groups.

Conclusions: Despite the small sample, this study supports usability and acceptability of . Increased adherence monitoring, even with remote coaching had limited appeal, which impacted feasibility due to slow recruitment, especially as community prescribing with relaxed monitoring requirements became more widespread.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9949338PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100045DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

usability acceptability
12
feasibility usability
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8
adherence monitoring
8
assessing feasibility
4
usability
4
acceptability
4
acceptability platform
4
platform individuals
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!