Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Anecdotally, clinicians have reported an increase in demand for permanent contraception procedures since the decision, which may reflect patients’ fear of losing reproductive autonomy. In this commentary we rely upon the history of bias and discrimination in permanent contraception access in the United States to interpret and predict potential outcomes following the decision. These findings can shape clinical practice as clinicians aim to balance meeting a patient’s contraceptive goals while upholding a commitment to avoid reproductive coercion. We provide recommendations for clinicians’ contraceptive counseling to ensure equitable access to permanent contraception for all patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659109 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109995 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!