Background: The aim of our study was to compare the number of lymph nodes removed during indocyanine green (ICG)-guided laparoscopic/robotic pelvic lymphadenectomy with standard systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (EC) and cervical cancer (CC).
Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective comparative study (Clinical Trial ID: NCT04246580; updated on 31 January 2023). Women affected by EC and CC who underwent laparoscopic/robotic systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy, with (cases) or without (controls) the use of ICG tracer injection within the uterine cervix, were included in the study.
Results: The two groups were homogeneous for age ( = 0.08), Body Mass Index, International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages ( = 0.41 for EC; = 0.17 for CC), median estimated blood loss ( = 0.76), median operative time ( = 0.59), and perioperative complications ( = 0.66). Nevertheless, the number of lymph nodes retrieved during surgery was significantly higher ( = 0.005) in the ICG group ( = 18) compared with controls ( = 16).
Conclusions: The accurate and precise dissection achieved with the use of the ICG-guided procedure was associated with a higher number of lymph nodes removed in the case of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy for EC and CC.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9963568 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043476 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!