Temporary restorations play a fundamental role in oral rehabilitation. A properly adapted implant-supported provisional restoration implies better esthetics, contouring and architectural modeling of the upper peri-implant tissue. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of oral pH on the fracture resistance of implant-supported provisional restorations made with two brands of bis-acrylic resin (LuxaCrown and Protemp™ 4) and to compare the fracture resistance of these two materials. Twenty crowns (ten manufactured using each brand) served as a control, and another forty crowns (twenty of each brand) were aged using artificial saliva with pHs of 4 or 7, for 7 days at 37 °C, in an attempt to simulate the behavior of these materials inside the oral cavity. Subsequently, all crowns were subjected to the application of a force at a constant speed, in a universal testing machine, until fracture was achieved. The LuxaCrown brand showed greater resistance to fracture than the Protemp™ 4 brand. Salivary pH did not influence the fracture resistance of provisional LuxaCrown crowns but did influence the fracture resistance of provisional Protemp™ 4 crowns.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9965934PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfb14020062DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fracture resistance
20
bis-acrylic resin
8
implant-supported provisional
8
influence fracture
8
resistance provisional
8
fracture
7
resistance
6
provisional
5
crowns
5
influence
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!