Effectiveness and Safety of Mitral Valve Plasty in Patients with an Anomalous Origin of the Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery.

The study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of anomalous coronary artery from pulmonary artery (ACAPA) patients with moderate or severe mitral valve regurgitation (MVR) receiving mitral valve plasty (MVP) concurrently. Consecutive ACAPA patients undergoing surgery between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into three groups: moderate MVR without MVP (non-MVP (moderate) N = 14), moderate MVR with MVP (MVP (moderate) N = 13), and severe MVR with MVP (MVP (severe) N = 13). The primary safety endpoint was in-hospital surgery-related complications. The primary effectiveness outcome was left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) z-score at 2- and 24-month follow-ups. Multivariable linear regression models were used to obtain the coefficient. The median age of the included patients was 7.5 years (IQR 1.4-26.5). The in-hospital surgery-related complication rates were 7.1%, 15.4%, and 7.7% in non-MVP (moderate), MVP (moderate), and MVP (severe) groups, separately. At the 2-month follow-up, the non-MVP (moderate) group had a better LVEF and LVEDD z-score compared with the MVP (moderate) group (LVEF = 9.22, 95%CI 1.09 to 17.35; LVEDD z-score = -2.49, 95%CI -4.53 to -0.45). At the 24-month follow-up, the LVEF of all patients and the LVEDD z-score of 90% of patients in the three groups returned to normal. For ACAPA patients with moderate MVR, MVP was not necessary, especially for pediatric patients (age < 3 years) and patients with secondary MVR. Further studies for ACAPA patients with severe MVR are still needed.