AI Article Synopsis

  • High-value diffusion-weighted images (DWI) are crucial for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), leading to synthesis of DWI to enhance efficiency and image quality.* -
  • This study retrospectively compared synthesized DWI (sDWI) to acquired DWI (aDWI) in 151 patients, using various b-values, and assessed their effectiveness in predicting csPCa.* -
  • Results showed that while sDWI has some qualitative similarities to aDWI, its accuracy and image quality are worse than aDWI and a validated biomarker, indicating limitations in using synthesized images for csPCa detection.*

Article Abstract

Background: High -value diffusion-weighted images (DWI) are used for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). To decrease scan time and improve signal-to-noise ratio, high -value (>1000 s/mm ) images are often synthesized instead of acquired.

Purpose: Qualitatively and quantitatively compare synthesized DWI (sDWI) to acquired (aDWI) for detection of csPCa.

Study Type: Retrospective.

Subjects: 151 consecutive patients who underwent prostate MRI and biopsy.

Sequence: Axial DWI with =0, 500, 1000, and 2000 s/mm using a 3T clinical scanner using a 32-channel phased-array body coil.

Assessment: We synthesized DWI for =2000 s/mm via extrapolation based on monoexponential decay, using =0 and =500 s/mm (sDWI ) and =0, =500, and =1000 s/mm (sDWI ). Differences between sDWI and aDWI were evaluated within regions of interest (ROIs). The maximum DWI value within each ROI was evaluated for prediction of csPCa. Classification accuracy was also compared to Restriction Spectrum Imaging restriction score (RSIrs), a previously validated biomarker based on multi-exponential DWI.

Statistical Tests: Discrimination of csPCa was evaluated via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Statistical significance was assessed using bootstrap difference (two-sided α=0.05).

Results: Within the prostate, mean ± standard deviation of percent mean differences between sDWI and aDWI signal were -46±35% for sDWI and -67±24% for sDWI . AUC for aDWI, sDWI sDWI , and RSIrs within the prostate 0.62[95% confidence interval: 0.53, 0.71], 0.63[0.54, 0.72], 0.65[0.56, 0.73] and 0.78[0.71, 0.86], respectively. When considering the whole field of view, classification accuracy and qualitative image quality decreased notably for sDWI compared to aDWI and RSIrs.

Data Conclusion: sDWI is qualitatively comparable to aDWI within the prostate. However, hyperintense artifacts are introduced with sDWI in the surrounding pelvic tissue that interfere with quantitative cancer detection and might mask metastases. In the prostate, RSIrs yields superior quantitative csPCa detection than sDWI or aDWI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9949172PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.17.23286100DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sdwi
13
high -value
12
sdwi adwi
12
-value diffusion-weighted
8
prostate cancer
8
synthesized dwi
8
s/mm sdwi
8
differences sdwi
8
classification accuracy
8
prostate
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!