Despite being unpredictable and uncertain, reward environments often exhibit certain regularities, and animals navigating these environments try to detect and utilize such regularities to adapt their behavior. However, successful learning requires that animals also adjust to uncertainty associated with those regularities. Here, we analyzed choice data from two comparable dynamic foraging tasks in mice and monkeys to investigate mechanisms underlying adjustments to different types of uncertainty. In these tasks, animals selected between two choice options that delivered reward probabilistically, while baseline reward probabilities changed after a variable number (block) of trials without any cues to the animals. To measure adjustments in behavior, we applied multiple metrics based on information theory that quantify consistency in behavior, and fit choice data using reinforcement learning models. We found that in both species, learning and choice were affected by uncertainty about reward outcomes (in terms of determining the better option) and by expectation about when the environment may change. However, these effects were mediated through different mechanisms. First, more uncertainty about the better option resulted in slower learning and forgetting in mice, whereas it had no significant effect in monkeys. Second, expectation of block switches accompanied slower learning, faster forgetting, and increased stochasticity in choice in mice, whereas it only reduced learning rates in monkeys. Overall, while demonstrating the usefulness of metrics based on information theory in examining adaptive behavior, our study provides evidence for multiple types of adjustments in learning and choice behavior according to uncertainty in the reward environment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10444905PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-022-01059-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uncertainty reward
12
mice monkeys
12
adjustments types
8
types uncertainty
8
reward environment
8
choice data
8
metrics based
8
learning choice
8
better option
8
slower learning
8

Similar Publications

Perceived fatigue does not alter effort-based decision making but does undermine confidence in the ability to perform physical actions.

Physiol Behav

December 2024

Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK; Department of Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, UK.

Fatigue may affect the decision to deploy effort (cost) for a given rewarded outcome (benefit). However, it remains unclear whether these fatigue-associated changes can be attributed to simply feeling fatigued. To investigate this question, twenty-two healthy males made a series of choices between two rewarded options: a fixed, no effort option, where no physical effort was required to obtain a set, low reward vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Adaptive mechanisms of learning models play critical roles in interpreting adaptive behavior of humans and animals. Different learning models, varying from Bayesian models, deep learning or regression models to reward-based reinforcement learning models, adopt similar update rules. These update rules can be reduced to the same generalized mathematical form: the Rescorla-Wagner equation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unconscious will as a neurobehavioral mechanism against adversity.

Neurosci Biobehav Rev

December 2024

Department of Biopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum,  Universitätsstraße 150, Bochum 44801, Germany. Electronic address:

Incentive salience theory both explains the directional component of motivation (in terms of cue attraction or "wanting") and its energetic component, as a function of the strength of cue attraction. This theory characterizes cue- and reward-triggered approach behavior. But it does not tell us how behavior can show enhanced vigor under reward uncertainty, when cues are inconsistent or resources hidden.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Systematic Review of Challenges and Opportunities in the Implementation of Managed Entry Agreements for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products.

Clin Ther

December 2024

Department of Epidemiology & Health Economics, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address:

Purpose: Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs) are agreements between firms and competent authorities for pricing and reimbursement, designed to enable coverage of new medicines while managing uncertainties around their financial impact or performance. Although these agreements can facilitate patient access, their complexity and costs seem to dampen enthusiasm for implementation. Nevertheless, MEAs remain a potential route, particularly for high-cost drugs with uncertain value claims.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The role of uncertain reward in voluntary task-switching as revealed by pupillometry and gaze.

Behav Brain Res

December 2024

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, Psychology Building, Building 0463, 515 Coke St, College Station, TX 77843, United States of America; Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, Interdisciplinary Life Sciences Building (ILSB), Room 3148 | 3474 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3474, United States of America. Electronic address:

Cognitive flexibility, the brain's ability to adjust to changes in the environment, is a critical component of executive functioning. Previous literature shows a robust relationship between reward dynamics and flexibility: flexibility is highest when reward changes, while flexibility decreases when reward remains stable. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of uncertain reward in a voluntary task switching paradigm on behavior, pupillometry, and eye gaze.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!