Ultra-high resolution photon-counting coronary CT angiography improves coronary stenosis quantification over a wide range of heart rates - A dynamic phantom study.

Eur J Radiol

Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, United States; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstraße 1, Mainz 55131, Germany; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz 55131, Germany. Electronic address:

Published: April 2023

Purpose: To investigate the effect of using photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT with ultra-high resolution (UHR) on stenosis quantification accuracy and blooming artifacts from low to high heart rates in a dynamic motion phantom.

Method: Two vessel phantoms (diameter: 4 mm) containing solid calcified lesions (25%, 50% stenoses), filled with different concentrations of iodine, inside an anthropomorphic thorax phantom attached to a coronary motion simulator were used. Scanning was performed on a PCD-CT system using an ECG-gated mode at UHR and standard resolution (SR) (0.2, 0.6 mm slice thickness, respectively). Images were reconstructed at 60, 80 and 100 beats per minute (bpm) (UHR: Bv56 kernel, quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) level 3; SR: 55 keV, Bv40 kernel, QIR3). Percent diameter stenosis (PDS) and blooming artifacts were measured by two readers.

Results: PDS measurements derived from UHR were more accurate than SR for both lesions at every heart rate (p ≤ 0.005 for all, e.g. 50% lesion SR vs. UHR: at 60 bpm 57.1% [55.2-59.2] vs. 50.0% [48.5-51.2], at 100 bpm 61.0% [58.6-64.3] vs. 52.4% [51.3-54.3]). Overall mean difference across heart rates and lesions compared to the nominal stenoses was 9.2% (Limit of Agreement (LoA), 2.4%/16.0%) for SR vs. 2.4% (LoA, -2.8%/7.5%) for UHR. Blooming artifacts decreased with UHR compared to SR for both lesions at every heart rate (p < 0.001 for all, e.g. 50% lesion SR vs. UHR: at 60 bpm 63.8% [60.6-69.5] vs. 52.5% [50.0-57.5], at 100 bpm 70.2% [64.8-78.1] vs. 56.1% [51.2-60.8]).

Conclusions: This motion phantom study demonstrates improved stenosis quantification accuracy and reduced blooming artifacts with UHR-PCD-CT compared to SR, independent of heart rate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110746DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

heart rates
12
blooming artifacts
12
ultra-high resolution
8
stenosis quantification
8
rates dynamic
8
lesions heart
8
heart rate
8
uhr
7
heart
5
resolution photon-counting
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!