A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A Bioequivalence Study With Pharmacokinetic Endpoints for Azithromycin Eye Drops. | LitMetric

A Bioequivalence Study With Pharmacokinetic Endpoints for Azithromycin Eye Drops.

Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev

Essex Bio-Technology Limited, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China.

Published: July 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Azithromycin eye drops with a bioadhesive system could simplify dosing compared to traditional methods.
  • A study was conducted comparing a new generic version of these eye drops to a branded version using 48 healthy volunteers, assessing how the drug behaves in the body.
  • Results showed that both formulations were bioequivalent, with acceptable drug concentration ratios and no serious side effects reported, indicating the new generic is just as effective.

Article Abstract

Azithromycin eye drops with a bioadhesive ocular drug-delivery system can offer a simplified dosing regimen. In this study, we compared the pharmacokinetic properties and assessed the bioequivalence of a newly developed generic azithromycin eye drop with a branded formulation. This open-label, single-dose, randomized, crossover, sparse-sampling ocular bioequivalence study was conducted on 48 healthy Chinese volunteers. Tear samples were collected for up to 36 hours, and each participant was randomly allocated to one of the prespecified sampling times. Tear drug concentrations were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated via noncompartmental analysis. A nonparametric bootstrap method was used to obtain 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of the test and reference drugs. Tolerability was evaluated for adverse events (AEs). After bootstrapping (1000 iterations), the 90%CIs for the log-transformed ratios of C , AUC , and AUC were within the acceptable bioequivalence range (80%-125%). No moderate-to-severe AEs were reported for either formulation. Bioequivalence was demonstrated between the two formulations. The sparse-sampling design with the bootstrapping technique is promising for bioequivalence studies of topical ophthalmic drugs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1226DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

azithromycin eye
12
bioequivalence study
8
eye drops
8
bioequivalence
6
study pharmacokinetic
4
pharmacokinetic endpoints
4
endpoints azithromycin
4
drops azithromycin
4
drops bioadhesive
4
bioadhesive ocular
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!