Optimal time intervals for vaginal breech births: a case-control study.

NIHR Open Res

Centre for Maternal & Child Health Research, City, University of London, 1 Myddleton Street, London, EC1R 1UB, UK.

Published: September 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • Breech births can lead to serious complications like hypoxic injury, and the Physiological Breech Birth Algorithm offers time guidelines for intervention during delivery.
  • A study conducted in London analyzed 15 breech birth cases and 30 controls from 2012 to 2020 to determine how exceeding these time limits affects neonatal outcomes.
  • Results indicated that delays beyond specified time frames were significantly linked to worse outcomes, with longer intervention times observed in adverse cases, suggesting room for improvement in clinical practices.

Article Abstract

Background: Breech births are associated with a high rate of hypoxic injury, in part due to cord occlusion during emergence. Maximum time intervals and guidelines oriented toward earlier intervention have been proposed in a Physiological Breech Birth Algorithm. We wished to further test and refine the Algorithm for use in a clinical trial.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study in a London teaching hospital, including 15 cases and 30 controls, during the period of April 2012 to April 2020. Our sample size was powered to test the hypothesis that exceeding recommended time limits is associated with neonatal admission or death. Data collected from intrapartum care records was analysed using SPSS v26 statistical software. Variables were intervals between the stages of labour and various stages of emergence (presenting part, buttocks, pelvis, arms, head). The chi-square test and odds ratios were used to determine association between exposure to the variables of interest and composite outcome. Multiple logistic regression was used to test the predictive value of delays defined as non-adherence the Algorithm.

Results: Logistic regression modelling using the Algorithm time frames had an 86.8% accuracy, a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 92.3% for predicting the primary outcome. Delays between umbilicus and head >3 minutes (OR: 9.508 [95% CI: 1.390-65.046] =0.022) and from buttocks on the perineum to head >7 minutes (OR: 6.682 [95% CI: 0.940-41.990] =0.058) showed the most effect. Lengths of time until the first intervention were consistently longer among the cases. Delay in intervention was more common among cases than head or arm entrapment.

Conclusion: Emergence taking longer than the limits recommended in the Physiological Breech Birth algorithm may be predictive of adverse outcomes. Some of this delay is potentially avoidable. Improved recognition of the boundaries of normality in vaginal breech births may help improve outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614205PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13297.2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breech births
12
time intervals
8
vaginal breech
8
case-control study
8
physiological breech
8
breech birth
8
birth algorithm
8
logistic regression
8
head minutes
8
breech
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!