AI Article Synopsis

  • Emergency departments (EDs) are crucial for healthcare but often have negative experiences for marginalized groups, prompting a study to understand these patients' perspectives.
  • The study involved an anonymous survey filled out by 2114 participants, comparing equity-deserving groups (EDGs) and controls to analyze differences in their ED experiences.
  • Findings revealed that EDGs reported feeling more judged and disrespected, had concerns about their identity affecting care, and felt disempowered in healthcare decisions compared to controls.

Article Abstract

Background: Emergency departments (EDs) serve an integral role in healthcare, particularly for vulnerable populations. However, marginalized groups often report negative ED experiences, including stigmatizing attitudes and behaviours. We engaged with historically marginalized patients to better understand their ED care experiences.

Method: Participants were invited to complete an anonymous mixed-methods survey about a previous ED experience. We analysed quantitative data including controls and equity-deserving groups (EDGs) - those who self-identified as: (a) Indigenous; (b) having a disability; (c) experiencing mental health issues; (d) a person who uses substances; (e) a sexual and gender minority; (f) a visible minority; (g) experiencing violence; and/or (h) facing homelessness - to identify differences in their perspectives. Differences between EDGs and controls were calculated with chi squared tests, geometric means with confidence ellipses, and the Kruskal-Wallis H test.

Results: We collected a total of 2114 surveys from 1973 unique participants, 949 controls and 994 who identified as equity-deserving. Members of EDGs were more likely to attribute negative feelings to their ED experience (p < 0.001), to indicate that their identity impacted the care received (p < 0.001), and that they felt disrespected and/or judged while in the ED (p < 0.001). Members of EDGs were also more likely to indicate that they had little control over healthcare decisions (p < 0.001) and that it was more important to be treated with kindness/respect than to receive the best possible care (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Members of EDGs were more likely to report negative ED care experiences. Equity-deserving individuals felt judged and disrespected by ED staff and felt disempowered to make decisions about their care. Next steps will include contextualizing findings using participants' qualitative data and identifying how to improve ED care experiences among EDGs to make it more inclusive and better able to meet their healthcare needs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942657PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00792-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

equity-deserving groups
8
emergency department
4
department care
4
care experiences
4
experiences members
4
members equity-deserving
4
groups quantitative
4
quantitative cross-sectional
4
cross-sectional mixed
4
mixed methods
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!