BackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is common after bariatric surgery and extended prophylaxis is generally recommended. Low molecular weight heparin is the most commonly used agent but requires patients to be trained to self-inject and is expensive. Rivaroxaban is an oral daily formulation approved for VTE prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery. Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban has been confirmed in major gastrointestinal resections by several observational studies. We report a single centre experience of using rivaroxaban as an agent for VTE prophylaxis in bariatric surgery. MethodsWe performed prospective cohort study assessing safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban as a medication for VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing bariatric surgery in a single centre in Kyiv, Ukraine. Patients undergoing major bariatric procedure received perioperative prophylaxis of VTE with subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin and then were switched to rivaroxaban for total of 30 days starting on the 4th postoperative day. Thromboprophylaxis was performed in accordance with the VTE risks derived from the Caprini score. On the 3rd, 30th, 60th day after the operation, the patients underwent ultrasound examination of the portal vein, as well as the veins of the lower extremities. Telephone interviews were conducted 30 and 60 days after the surgery to evaluate the presence of complaints which may be characteristic for VTE as well as to assess compliance with the regimen and to assess patient satisfaction. Outcomes studies were incidence of VTE and adverse events related to rivaroxaban administration.Results110 patients were included in the study from July 2019 to May 2021. The average age of the patients was 43.6 years, the average preoperative BMI was 55 (35 to 75). One hundred and seven patients (97.3%) underwent laparoscopic intervention while three patients (2.7%) underwent laparotomy. Eighty-four patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy and twenty-six patients underwent other procedures, including bypass surgery. Average calculated risk of thromboembolic event was 5-6% based on Caprine index. All patients were treated with extended prophylaxis with rivaroxaban. The average follow-up period for patients was 6 months. There were no clinical or radiological evidence of thromboembolic complications in the study cohort. Overall complication rate was 7.2%, however, only one patient (0.9%) developed subcutaneous hematoma associated with rivaroxaban not requiring intervention. ConclusionExtended postoperative prophylaxis with rivaroxaban is safe and effective in preventing thromboembolic complications in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. It is preferred by patients and further studies should be considered to further evaluate its use in bariatric surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.2729 | DOI Listing |
Obes Surg
December 2024
Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, University Hospitals Sussex (St Richard's Hospital), Chichester, UK.
Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) reversal might be necessary to alleviate refractory surgical or nutritional complications, such as postprandial hypoglycemia, malnutrition, marginal ulceration, malabsorption, chronic diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, chronic pain, or excessive weight loss. The surgical technique of RYGB reversal is not standardized; potential strategies include the following: (1) gastro-gastrostomy: hand-sewn technique, linear stapler, circular stapler; (2) handling of the Roux limb: reconnection or resection (if remaining intestinal length ≥ 4 m).
Case Presentation: We demonstrate the surgical technique of a laparoscopic reversal of RYGB with hand-sewn gastro-gastrostomy and resection of the alimentary limb with the aim of improving the patient's quality of life.
Surg Obes Relat Dis
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Marshall University Joan Edwards School of Medicine, West Virginia.
Background: The difference in survival between sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains controversial.
Objective: To investigate the comparative survival difference between SG and RYGB in adults with morbid obesity.
Setting: A meta-analysis.
Surg Obes Relat Dis
November 2024
Yale Department of Surgery; New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address:
Surg Obes Relat Dis
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address:
Background: Metabolic bariatric surgery is the most effective therapy for severe obesity, which affects the health of millions, most of whom are women of child-bearing age. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the most common bariatric procedures and are associated with durable weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Although obstetric outcomes broadly improve, the safety profile comparing the impact of RYGB and SG on obstetric outcomes is underexplored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurg Obes Relat Dis
December 2024
Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Background: Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery is growing rapidly. The optimal approach to minimize complications remains unclear.
Objective: Assess robot utilization and compare 30-day outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!