Background: Guidelines emphasize rapid antibiotic treatment for sepsis, but infection presence is often uncertain at initial presentation. We investigated the incidence and drivers of false-positive presumptive infection diagnosis among emergency department (ED) patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria.

Methods: For a retrospective cohort of patients hospitalized after meeting Sepsis-3 criteria (acute organ failure and suspected infection including blood cultures drawn and intravenous antimicrobials administered) in 1 of 4 EDs from 2013 to 2017, trained reviewers first identified the ED-diagnosed source of infection and adjudicated the presence and source of infection on final assessment. Reviewers subsequently adjudicated final infection probability for a randomly selected 10% subset of subjects. Risk factors for false-positive infection diagnosis and its association with 30-day mortality were evaluated using multivariable regression.

Results: Of 8267 patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria in the ED, 699 (8.5%) did not have an infection on final adjudication and 1488 (18.0%) patients with confirmed infections had a different source of infection diagnosed in the ED versus final adjudication (ie, initial/final source diagnosis discordance). Among the subset of patients whose final infection probability was adjudicated (n = 812), 79 (9.7%) had only "possible" infection and 77 (9.5%) were not infected. Factors associated with false-positive infection diagnosis included hypothermia, altered mental status, comorbidity burden, and an "unknown infection source" diagnosis in the ED (odds ratio: 6.39; 95% confidence interval: 5.14-7.94). False-positive infection diagnosis was not associated with 30-day mortality.

Conclusions: In this large multihospital study, <20% of ED patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria had no infection or only possible infection on retrospective adjudication.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273369PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad101DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

meeting sepsis-3
16
infection diagnosis
16
infection
15
patients meeting
12
sepsis-3 criteria
12
source infection
12
false-positive infection
12
emergency department
8
infection final
8
final infection
8

Similar Publications

Culture-negative sepsis may be a different entity from culture-positive sepsis: a prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study.

Crit Care

November 2024

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.

Background: The distinction between culture-positive sepsis and culture-negative sepsis regarding clinical characteristics and outcomes remains contentious. We aimed to elucidate these differences using large-scale nationwide data.

Methods: This prospective cohort study analyzed data from the Korean Sepsis Alliance registry, comprising 21 intensive care units (ICUs) across 20 hospitals from September 2019 to December 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Reinforcement Learning Model for Optimal Treatment Strategies in Intensive Care: Assessment of the Role of Cardiorespiratory Features.

IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol

February 2024

Department of Electronics, Informatics and EngineeringPolitecnico di Milano 20133 Milano Italy.

Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluates the role of cardiorespiratory variables in a Reinforcement Learning (RL) model designed to optimize drug treatment strategies for septic patients in the ICU.
  • The RL model developed showcases a significant performance boost when using cardiorespiratory data, outperforming other models that utilized different sets of features.
  • The findings advocate for real-time recommendation systems in sepsis treatment, leveraging the continuous availability of cardiorespiratory monitoring data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Assessing sepsis-induced immunosuppression to predict positive blood cultures.

Front Immunol

November 2024

Servei de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.

Introduction: Bacteremia is a life-threatening condition that can progress to sepsis and septic shock, leading to significant mortality in the emergency department (ED). The standard diagnostic method, blood culture, is time-consuming and prone to false positives and false negatives. Although not widely accepted, several clinical and artificial intelligence-based algorithms have been recently developed to predict bacteremia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To investigate the potential impact of preoperative semaglutide use (the active agent in Ozempic and Wegovy) on 90-day postoperative outcomes and 2-year rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in patients with type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: Patients with T2DM undergoing primary ARCR were identified from the PearlDiver database using administrative billing codes. Exclusion criteria included patients <18 years old; previous RCR; concurrent nonrotator cuff-related arthroscopic shoulder procedures; any traumatic, neoplastic, or infectious diagnoses within 90 days before surgery; and <90-days follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Endotype classification becomes the cornerstone of understanding sepsis pathogenesis. Macrophage activation-like syndrome (MALS) and immunoparalysis are the best recognized major endotypes, so far. Interferon-gamma (IFNγ) action on tissue macrophages stimulates the release of the cytotoxic chemokine CXCL9.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!