AI Article Synopsis

  • Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common problem in older men, and different treatments can have different results, so more research is needed to understand them better.
  • This study looked at two treatments for BPH: transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP), comparing how well they work and their side effects.
  • Results showed that PKEP had fewer complications and shorter hospital stays compared to TURP, and it also resulted in better quality of life scores for patients at follow-up.

Article Abstract

Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease in elderly males, and many kinds of minimally invasive procedures can be used for the treatment of BPH. However, various procedures have caused some controversies regarding clinical outcomes, so more studies are needed to validate these controversial topics.

Aims: This study aimed to explore differences of clinical efficacy, surgical features, and complications between transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) for BPH.

Methods: A total of eligible 850 cases of BPH underwent TURP (the TURP group, 320 cases) or PKEP (the PKEP group, 530 cases) in the urology department of our hospital from March 2015 to 2018 were involved in this study. Then, the baseline data, surgical characteristics, IPSS, QoL, PVR, Q IIEF-5, and documented complications were compared between the two groups.

Results: The operative time, intraoperative irrigation volume, postoperative hemoglobin, decrease in hemoglobin, postoperative irrigation time and volume, catheterization time, and hospital stay of the PKEP group were significantly less than those of the TURP group (all P < 0.05). At 3 months, 1, 2, and 3 years after operation, no significant differences were observed in IPSS, QoL, PVR, but the results of Q and IIEF-5 in the PKEP group were significantly higher than those parameters in the TURP group (all P < 0.05). The incidences of massive blood loss, postoperative secondary bleeding, blood transfusion, capsular perforation, urinary tract irritation, bladder spasm, clot retention, urinary tract infection, transient incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and the incidences of II, III grade of Clavien-Dindo classification in the PKEP group were significantly lower than those of the TURP group (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of PKEP is compared favorably with TURP during midterm follow-up. Given the merits such as less blood loss and hospital stay, lower complications, PKEP should be given a priority for BPH.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938974PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-00989-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical efficacy
8
complications transurethral
8
transurethral resection
8
resection prostate
8
plasmakinetic enucleation
8
enucleation prostate
8
turp group
8
pkep group
8
efficacy complications
4
prostate
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!