A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Influence of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Derived 3D-Printed Models on Endodontic Microsurgical Treatment Planning and Confidence of the Operator. | LitMetric

The Influence of Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Derived 3D-Printed Models on Endodontic Microsurgical Treatment Planning and Confidence of the Operator.

J Endod

Department of Endodontics, Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, University of the Pacific, San Francisco, California; College of Dentistry, Manila Central University, Caloocan City, Philippines. Electronic address:

Published: May 2023

Introduction: Currently, there are no studies evaluating the impact of 3-dimensional (3D) printed models on endodontic surgical treatment planning. The aims of this study were: 1) to determine if 3D models could influence treatment planning; and 2) to assess the effect of 3D supported planning on operator confidence.

Materials: Endodontic practitioners (n = 25) were asked to analyze a preselected cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan of an endodontic surgical case and answer a questionnaire that elucidated their surgical approach. After 30 days, the same participants were asked to analyze the same CBCT scan. Additionally, participants were asked to study and to perform a mock osteotomy on a 3D printed model. The participants responded to the same questionnaire along with a new set of questions. Responses were statistically analyzed using chi square test followed by either logistic or ordered regression analysis. Adjustment for multiple comparison analysis was done using a Bonferroni correction. Statistical significance was set at ≤0.005.

Results: The availability of both the 3D printed model and the CBCT scan resulted in statistically significant differences in the participants' responses to their ability to detect bone landmarks, predict the location of osteotomy, and to determine the following: size of osteotomy, angle of instrumentation, involvement of critical structures in flap reflection and involvement of vital structures during curettage. In addition, the participants' confidence in performing surgery was found to be significantly higher.

Conclusions: The availability of 3D printed models did not alter the participants' surgical approach but it significantly improved their confidence for endodontic microsurgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.02.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment planning
12
cbct scan
12
cone beam
8
beam computed
8
models endodontic
8
printed models
8
endodontic surgical
8
asked analyze
8
surgical approach
8
participants asked
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!