Forearm Muscle Activity During the Handgrip Test in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Clin Breast Cancer

Departamento de Fisioterapia, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Málaga, Andalucia Tech, Málaga, España; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina-IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND, Málaga, España; School of Clinical Science, Faculty of Health Science, Queensland University Technology, Brisbrane, Queensland,Australia.

Published: June 2023

Introduction/background: Breast cancer survivors (BCS) frequently show upper limb dysfunctions. The forearm muscle activity measured by surface electromyography (sEMG) in this population has not been studied. This study aimed to describe forearm muscle activity in BCS, as well as to assess its possible relationship with other variables related to upper limb functionality and cancer-related fatigue (CRF).

Materials And Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out including 102 BCS as volunteers at a secondary care in Malaga, Spain. BCS were included if they were aged between 32 and 70 years old, without evidence of cancer recurrence at the time of recruitment. The forearm muscle activity (microvolts, µV) was assessed by sEMG during the handgrip test. The handgrip strength was assessed by dynamometry (kg), the upper limb functionality (%) was measured by the upper limb functional index (ULFI) questionnaire and the CRF was also assessed by revised Piper Fatigue Scale (0-10 points).

Results: BCS reported reduced forearm muscle activity (287.88 µV) and reduced handgrip strength (21.31 Kg), a good upper limb functionality (68.85%), and a moderate cancer-related fatigue (4.74). Forearm muscle activity showed a poor significant correlation (r = -0.223, P = .038) with the CRF. Handgrip strength showed a poor correlation with the upper limb functionality (r = 0.387, P < .001) and age (r=-0.200, P = .047).

Conclusion: BCS showed a reduced forearm muscle activity. BCS also presented a poor correlation between forearm muscle activity and handgrip strength. Both outcomes tended to lower values with higher levels of CRF, while preserving a good upper limb functionality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2023.01.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

forearm muscle
32
muscle activity
32
upper limb
28
limb functionality
20
handgrip strength
16
poor correlation
12
forearm
8
activity
8
activity handgrip
8
handgrip test
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!