A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Modified natural and optimized programmed frozen embryo transfers have equivalent live birth rates: an analysis of 6,682 cycles. | LitMetric

Modified natural and optimized programmed frozen embryo transfers have equivalent live birth rates: an analysis of 6,682 cycles.

Fertil Steril

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Boston IVF-The Eugin Group, Waltham, Massachusetts.

Published: July 2023

Objective: To compare the live birth rates (LBRs) in modified natural and programmed single blastocyst frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: University-affiliated fertility practice.

Patient(s): Patients who underwent single blastocyst FETs between January 2014 and December 2019. A total of 15,034 FET cycles from 9,092 patients were reviewed; 1,186 modified natural and 5,496 programmed FET cycles from 4,532 patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis.

Intervention(s): No intervention.

Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome measure was the LBR.

Result(s): There was no difference in live birth after programmed cycles using intramuscular (IM) progesterone or a combination of vaginal progesterone and IM progesterone compared with that after modified natural cycles (adjusted relative risks, 0.94 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.85-1.04] and 0.91 [95% CI, 0.82-1.02], respectively). The relative risk of live birth decreased in programmed cycles that used exclusively vaginal progesterone compared with that in modified natural cycles (adjusted relative risk, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.69-0.86]).

Conclusion(s): The LBR decreased in programmed cycles that used only vaginal progesterone. However, no difference in the LBRs existed between modified natural and programmed cycles if programmed cycles used either IM progesterone or a combination of IM and vaginal progesterone protocols. This study demonstrates that modified natural FET cycles and optimized programmed FET cycles have equivalent LBRs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

modified natural
28
programmed cycles
20
live birth
16
fet cycles
16
vaginal progesterone
16
cycles
12
programmed
9
optimized programmed
8
frozen embryo
8
birth rates
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!