In recent years, the field of neuroscience has gone through rapid experimental advances and a significant increase in the use of quantitative and computational methods. This growth has created a need for clearer analyses of the theory and modeling approaches used in the field. This issue is particularly complex in neuroscience because the field studies phenomena that cross a wide range of scales and often require consideration at varying degrees of abstraction, from precise biophysical interactions to the computations they implement. We argue that a pragmatic perspective of science, in which descriptive, mechanistic, and normative models and theories each play a distinct role in defining and bridging levels of abstraction, will facilitate neuroscientific practice. This analysis leads to methodological suggestions, including selecting a level of abstraction that is appropriate for a given problem, identifying transfer functions to connect models and data, and the use of models themselves as a form of experiment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9962842PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1179-22.2022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

theory modeling
8
role theory
4
modeling neuroscience
4
neuroscience years
4
years field
4
field neuroscience
4
neuroscience rapid
4
rapid experimental
4
experimental advances
4
advances increase
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!