AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) and systemic effects of fluticasone/formoterol delivered via a breath-actuated inhaler (BAI) versus a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) in healthy volunteers.
  • Study 1 focused on assessing drug exposure by administering single doses of fluticasone/formoterol through different devices, aiming to confirm that the BAI delivers a similar or better concentration of the drug compared to the pMDI.
  • Study 2 involved evaluating the systemic pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of formoterol, specifically monitoring serum potassium levels after administration, confirming the safety and effectiveness of BAI in comparison to pMDI methods.

Article Abstract

Fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate (fluticasone/formoterol) exposures, following administration of Flutiform K-haler, a breath-actuated inhaler (BAI), were compared with the Flutiform pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) with/without spacer in two healthy volunteer studies. In addition, formoterol-induced systemic pharmacodynamic (PD) effects were examined in the second study. Study 1: single-dose, three-period, crossover pharmacokinetic (PK) study with oral charcoal administration. Fluticasone/formoterol 250/10 μg was administered via BAI, pMDI, or pMDI with spacer (pMDI+S). Pulmonary exposure for BAI was deemed no less than for pMDI (primary comparator) if the lower limit of 94.12% confidence intervals (CIs) for BAI:pMDI maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCt) ratios was ≥80%. Study 2: two-stage adaptive design, both stages being single-dose, crossover without charcoal administration. The PK stage compared fluticasone/formoterol 250/10 μg via BAI, pMDI, or pMDI+S. The primary comparisons were as follows: BAI versus pMDI+S for fluticasone and BAI versus pMDI for formoterol. Systemic safety with BAI was deemed no worse than primary comparator if the upper limit of 94.12% CIs for Cmax and AUCt ratios was ≤125%. PD assessment was to be conducted if BAI safety was not confirmed in the PK stage. Based on PK results, only formoterol PD effects were evaluated. The PD stage compared fluticasone/formoterol 1500/60 μg via BAI, pMDI, or pMDI+S; fluticasone/formoterol 500/20 μg pMDI; and formoterol 60 μg pMDI. The primary endpoint was maximum reduction in serum potassium within 4 hours postdose. Equivalence was defined as 95% CIs for BAI versus pMDI+S and pMDI ratios within 0.5-2.0. Study 1: lower limit of 94.12% CIs for BAI:pMDI ratios >80%. Study 2, PK stage: upper limit of 94.12% CIs for fluticasone (BAI:pMDI+S) ratios <125%; upper limit of 94.12% CIs for formoterol (BAI:pMDI) ratios >125% (for Cmax, not AUCt). Study 2, PD stage: 95% CIs for serum potassium ratios 0.7-1.3 (BAI:pMDI+S) and 0.4-1.5 (BAI:pMDI). Fluticasone/formoterol BAI performance was within the range observed for the pMDI with/without a spacer. Sponsor: Mundipharma Research Ltd. EudraCT 2012-003728-19 (Study 1) and 2013-000045-39 (Study 2).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2022.0064DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

limit 9412%
16
bai pmdi
12
bai versus
12
9412% cis
12
bai
11
pmdi
11
study
9
fluticasone propionate/formoterol
8
propionate/formoterol fumarate
8
pressurized metered-dose
8

Similar Publications

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the most prescribed anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs. However, their use is often limited by substantial side effects, such as GC-induced osteoporosis (GIO) with the underlying mechanisms still not fully understood. In this study, we identify Tau as a low-affinity binding receptor for GCs that plays a crucial role in GIO.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The interaction between peptides and MHC molecules is crucial for understanding autoimmunity and improving cancer immunotherapies.
  • Recent advancements reveal that traditional sequence-based prediction methods have limitations, prompting the need for better approaches.
  • The new structure-based methods, utilizing geometric deep learning and self-supervised learning, show improved accuracy and efficiency in predicting MHC-bound peptides, even outperforming conventional methods with significantly less data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Detailed evaluation of prostate cancer glands is an essential yet labor-intensive step in grading prostate cancer. Gland segmentation can serve as a valuable preliminary step for machine-learning-based downstream tasks, such as Gleason grading, patient classification, cancer biomarker building, and survival analysis. Despite its importance, there is currently a lack of a reliable gland segmentation model for prostate cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Digital health interventions and economic incentives have shown promise in facilitating diabetes self-management, though evidence is limited. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive app-based diabetes self-management programme with rewards for healthy behaviours and health outcomes.

Materials And Methods: The TRIal to slow the Progression Of Diabetes (TRIPOD) study was an open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial conducted at Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Early detection of prostate cancer is critical for successful treatment and survival. However, current diagnostic methods such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and digital rectal examination (DRE) have limitations in accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. Recent research suggests that urinary volatile organic compounds (VOCs) could serve as potential biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!