Background: Females, people with young-onset PD and older individuals, and non-white populations are historically underrepresented in clinical Parkinson's disease (PD) research. Furthermore, research traditionally focused predominantly on motor symptoms of PD. Including a representative and diverse group of people with PD and also studying non-motor symptoms is warranted to better understand heterogeneity in PD and to generalize research findings.
Objective: This project aimed to determine whether, within a consecutive series of PD studies performed within a single center in the Netherlands: (1) the proportion of included females, mean age and proportion of native Dutch people changed over time; and 2) reports of the ethnicity of participants and the proportion of studies with non-motor outcomes changed over time.
Methods: Characteristics of participants and non-motor outcomes were analyzed using a unique dataset of summary statistics of studies with a large number of participants conducted at a single center during a 19-year period (2003-2021).
Results: Results indicate no relationship between calendar time and proportion of females (mean 39 %), mean age (66 years), proportion of studies that reported ethnicity, and proportion of native Dutch people in studies (range 97-100 %). The proportion of participants in whom non-motor symptoms were assessed increased, but this difference was consistent with chance.
Conclusion: Study participants in this center reflect the PD population in the Netherlands in terms of sex, but older individuals and non-native Dutch individuals are under-represented. We have still a lot to do in ensuring adequate representation and diversity in PD patients within our research.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923175 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prdoa.2023.100185 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!