Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Sexual well-being (SWB) is an important aspect of overall quality of life and should therefore be considered when measuring the effect of breast cancer on daily life.
Aim: To identify positive and negative predictive factors associated with change in SWB 1 year after diagnosis (T12; hereafter, ∆SWB) and whether SWB changes the year after.
Methods: All data were derived from an online patient-reported outcome measure that included patients aged >18 years who were treated for breast cancer between October 2015 and March 2022 at the Erasmus University Medical Center. Multivariable linear regression was used to analyze the association between demographic- and disease-specific variables and change in SWB between time of diagnoses (T0) and one year after (T12) (∆SWB). For defining the clinical relevance of ∆SWB, patients were divided into 3 groups based on their SWB score at T12: decreased, stable, and improved. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to test the difference in SWB between T12 and T24 (2 years after diagnosis) in all 3 groups.
Outcomes: Outcomes included the associations between demographic- and disease-specific variables and ∆SWB (T0 vs T12) and change in SWB the year after (T12 vs T24).
Results: An overall 204 patients were included, with a mean age of 51.7 years (SD, 12.8) and a mean SWB score of 64.3 (SD, 20.9) at T0. Body mass index >30 kg/m2 at T0 had a significant negative association (β = -8.369, P = .019) with ∆SWB. Reconstruction (β = 20.136, P < .001) and mastectomy (β = 11.157, P < .001) had a significant positive association with ∆SWB vs lumpectomy. Change in psychological well-being had a significant positive relation to ∆SWB (β = 0.349, P < .001). Patients with decreased SWB at T12 did not improve the year after (P = .376).
Clinical Implications: By identifying the variables that are associated with decreased SWB during the trajectory of breast cancer treatment and by defining the clinical relevance of decreased SWB, patient groups can be targeted and offered extra support.
Strengths And Limitations: This study is one of the first to analyze the development of SWB, instead of sexual function, over time in patients with breast cancer, and it uses data over a longer period. However, only one-third of the patients responded to the SWB domains at both time points.
Conclusion: Type of operation, body mass index >30, and change in psychological well-being were associated with ∆SWB. Patients with decreased SWB 1 year after diagnosis tended not to improve or normalize the year after, indicating that intervention is needed to restore SWB in this specific group.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdad007 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!