A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of the Minimal Proximal Resection Margin in Total Gastrectomy for Siewert II Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study explored the viability of a shorter minimal proximal resection margin (PRM) in total gastrectomy for patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.
  • A total of 178 patients were divided into two groups based on PRM length (20-25 mm vs. 30-35 mm) to compare various surgical outcomes.
  • The findings indicated that the 20-25 mm PRM group experienced significantly shorter operation times without compromising short-term or long-term postoperative outcomes compared to the 30-35 mm group, suggesting it may be a suitable option for surgery.

Article Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of the minimal proximal resection margin (PRM) in total gastrectomy (TG) for Siewert II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).

Methods: This study finally included 178 Siewert II advanced AEG patients who underwent TG from January 2017 to September 2020. According to the PRM length, patients were divided into 20-25 mm group and 30-35 mm group. Intraoperative, short-, and long-term postoperative outcomes were compared between two groups.

Results: The PRM of the 20-25 mm group had significantly less operation time compared with the PRM of the 30-35 mm group ( < .001), but the amount of blood loss, management of the diaphragmatic crura, and the incidence of positive resection margin were not significantly different between two groups (P > .05). In short-term postoperative outcomes, first gas-passing time, gastric-tube removal time, start time of diet, hospitalization, postoperative complications, and body weight loss were similar between two groups (P > .05). During the follow-up, the 3-year overall survival rates and the recurrence rates were not significantly different between the PRM of 20-25 mm and 30-35 mm groups (81.2% vs 83.5%, P = .695; 18.8% vs 15.5%, P = .812, respectively).

Conclusion: With less operation time and more preserved esophagus, the minimal PRM length of 20-25 mm could be an appropriate option in TG for patients with Siewert II advanced AEG.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00031348231156773DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

resection margin
12
short- long-term
8
minimal proximal
8
proximal resection
8
total gastrectomy
8
gastrectomy siewert
8
siewert adenocarcinoma
8
adenocarcinoma esophagogastric
8
esophagogastric junction
8
siewert advanced
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!