The impact of an intervention to improve intrapartum maternal vital sign monitoring and reduce alarm fatigue.

Background: The infrastructure of many labor and delivery units in the United States may dispose clinicians to overuse continuous and automated maternal physiological monitors. Overmonitoring low-risk patients can negatively affect patient care, primarily through generating alarm fatigue.

Objective: Given the national attention to reducing alarm fatigue across healthcare settings and the concern for vital sign monitoring overuse on our labor and delivery unit, this quality improvement study aimed to evaluate vital sign monitoring patterns and alarm rates, and nursing experiences of alarm fatigue, before and after implementing a vital sign monitoring guideline for low-risk obstetrical patients.

Study Design: This was a quality improvement study conducted on the labor and delivery unit of an urban, academic, tertiary hospital. The lack of guidance for maternal vital sign assessment in low-risk patients was identified as a potential safety challenge. A vital sign guideline was developed with multidisciplinary input, followed by a pre-post-implementation study evaluating vital sign volume and alarm rates. Total vital signs and alarm rates for all patients delivered during designated calendar days were assessed as a rate of vital signs per patient and compared across baseline, peri-intervention, and follow-up periods. Data were examined in p-type statistical process control charts and with time-series analysis. Patient characteristics and severe maternal morbidity, as a balancing metric, were compared across periods. Nursing perceptions of vital sign monitoring and experience of alarm fatigue were assessed via survey before and after implementation of the guideline.

Results: A total of 35 individual 24-hour periods were evaluated with regard to vital sign and alarm volume. There was a decrease in vital signs per patient from a mean of 208.34 to 135.46 (incidence rate ratio, 0.65) and in alarms per patient from a mean of 14.31 to 10.51 (incidence rate ratio, 0.73) after implementation, with no difference in severe maternal morbidity. There were 85 total respondents to the nursing surveys, and comparison of modified task-load index scores before and after implementation demonstrated overall lower scores in the postperiod, although these were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Introducing a maternal vital sign guideline for low-risk patients on the labor and delivery unit decreased vital signs measured as well as alarms, which may ultimately reduce alarm fatigue. This strategy should be considered on labor and delivery units widely to improve patient safety and optimize outcomes.