We identified 39 patients (23 female and 16 male) underwent hip revisions through mega-prosthesis. The most common causes were periprosthetic fractures, periprosthetic osteolysis and consequences of infected arthroplasty. The average follow-up was 5 years (2.1 to 6.5), and average age was 69 years (47 to 78). At the final follow-up all the implants resulted functional and osteointegrated. The Merle D'Aubignè and Postel hip rating scale was used for the evaluation, better results were observed in periprosthetic fractures. Postoperative complications occurred in eight patients. Thus, megaprosthesis were a reasonable surgical option in the management of major femoral defects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907321PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.52965/001c.38432DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

femoral defects
8
periprosthetic fractures
8
major proximal
4
proximal femoral
4
defects megaprosthesis
4
megaprosthesis oncological
4
oncological patients
4
patients case
4
case series
4
series identified
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!