Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare the long-term cephalometric stability after successful therapy of nonextraction Class II malocclusion with elastics and with headgear.

Methods: The sample comprised 43 patients with Class II malocclusion and was divided into 2 groups. The elastic group (EG) consisted of 20 patients treated with fixed appliances associated with Class II elastics, and the headgear group (HG) consisted of 23 patients treated with fixed appliances and extraoral headgear. Pretreatment, posttreatment, and long-term posttreatment lateral radiographs were evaluated; t tests were used to compare the long-term posttreatment changes between the groups.

Results: The groups were matched regarding initial age, time of long-term posttreatment evaluation, initial malocclusion severity, quality of treatment result, and all pretreatment cephalometric variables. Intergroup comparisons of long-term posttreatment changes showed that the HG group presented significantly greater mandibular protrusion, occlusal plane angle decrease, and maxillary molar mesialization. However, long-term posttreatment stability was similar in overjet, overbite, and molar relationships.

Conclusions: Nonextraction Class II malocclusion treatment with elastics or extraoral headgear have similar long-term posttreatment stability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.10.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

long-term posttreatment
24
class malocclusion
16
malocclusion treatment
8
class elastics
8
compare long-term
8
nonextraction class
8
group consisted
8
consisted patients
8
patients treated
8
treated fixed
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!