Regression analysis on forward modeling of diffuse optical tomography system for carcinoma cell detection.

Sci Rep

Centre for Excellence-Indigenous Knowledge, Innovative Technology Transfer and Entrepreneurship, Dambi Dollo University, Dembi Dolo, Ethiopia.

Published: February 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The forward model design in Diffuse Optical Tomography (DOT) optimized photonic flux in soft tissues, focusing on parameters like absorption and reduced scattering coefficients.
  • The Box-Behnken Design (BBD) method enhanced the experimental system, analyzing factors like laser diode voltages and source-detector spacing to create accurate tissue image contours.
  • The study found that these factors significantly impacted imaging, with low residual error percentages, indicating strong predictions for tissue properties in the DOT system.

Article Abstract

The forward model design was employed in the Diffuse Optical Tomography (DOT) system to determine the optimal photonic flux in soft tissues like the brain and breast. Absorption coefficient (mua), reduced scattering coefficient (mus), and photonic flux (phi) were the parameters subjected to optimization. The Box-Behnken Design (BBD) method of the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was applied to enhance the Diffuse Optical Tomography experimental system. The DC modulation voltages applied to different laser diodes of 850 nm and 780 nm wavelengths and spacing between the source and detector are the two factors operating on three optimization parameters that predicted the result through two-dimensional tissue image contours. The analysis of the Variance (ANOVA) model developed was substantial (R =  > 0.954). The experimental results indicate that spacing and wavelength were more influential factors for rebuilding image contour. The position of the tumor in soft tissues is inspired by parameters like absorption coefficient and scattering coefficient, which depend on DC voltages applied to the Laser diode. This regression method predicted the values throughout the studied parameter space and was suitable for enhancement learning of diffuse optical tomography systems. The range of residual error percentage evaluated between experimental and predicted values for mua, mus, and phi was 0.301%, 0.287%, and 0.1%, respectively.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9918525PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29063-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diffuse optical
16
optical tomography
16
photonic flux
8
soft tissues
8
absorption coefficient
8
scattering coefficient
8
voltages applied
8
applied laser
8
predicted values
8
regression analysis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!