Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Cellular senescence is a cellular response to stress, including the activation of oncogenes, and is characterized by irreversible proliferation arrest. Restricted studies have provided a relationship between cellular senescence and immunotherapy for esophageal cancer.
Methods: In the present study, we obtained clinical sample of colon cancer from the TCGA database and cellular senescence-related genes from MSigDB and Genecard datasets. Cellular senescence-related prognostic genes were identified by WGCNA, COX, and lasso regression analysis, and a cellular senescence-related risk score (CSRS) was calculated. We constructed a prognostic model based on CSRS. Validation was performed with an independent cohort that GSE53625. Three scoring systems for immuno-infiltration analysis were performed, namely ssGSEA analysis, ESTIMATE scores and TIDE scores.
Result: Five cellular senescence-related genes, including H3C1, IGFBP1, MT1E, SOX5 and CDHR4 and used to calculate risk score. Multivariate regression analysis using cox regression model showed that cellular senescence-related risk scores (HR=2.440, 95% CI=1.154-5.159, p=0.019) and pathological stage (HR=2.423, 95% CI=1.119-5.249, p=0.025) were associated with overall survival (OS). The nomogram model predicts better clinical benefit than the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer with a five-year AUC of 0.946. Patients with high CSRS had a poor prognosis (HR=2.93, 95%CI=1.74-4.94, p<0.001). We observed differences in the distribution of CSRS in different pathological staging and therefore performed a subgroup survival analysis finding that assessment of prognosis by CSRS independent of pathological staging. Comprehensive immune infiltration analysis and functional enrichment analysis suggested that patients with high CSRS may develop immunotherapy resistance through mechanisms of deacetylation and methylation.
Discussion: In summary, our study suggested that CSRS is a prognostic risk factor for esophageal cancer. Patients with high CSRS may have worse immunotherapy outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9905418 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1090700 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!