Expert Consensus Statement on Proficiency Standards for Dermoscopy Education in Primary Care.

J Am Board Fam Med

From the Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (TT, HQD, KCN); Department of Family Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland (PRC, HTA); Department of Family Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (PRC, DRE); Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland (AV, TAJ); Swedish First Hill Family Medicine Residency, Seattle, WA (MDL); Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland (EGB, JL, AW); Christus St. Vincent Family Medicine Center, Sante Fe, NM (WB); Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland (RPB); Cabin Creek Health Systems, Dawes, WV (JMC-L); Lincoln Medical Partners, Damariscotta, ME (VLD); Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA (LKF); Dermatology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium (EH); Institute of Experimental & Clinical Research, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium (EH); Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (RIH); Melanoma Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA (RIH); Veterans Integrated Services Network, Jamaica Plain, MA (RIH); Department of Family Medicine, East Tennessee State University James H. Quillen College of Medicine, Johnson City, TN (JH); Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL (NJ); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL (NJ); Department of Internal Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Cape Elizabeth, ME (ZK); The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York (TNL, JAS); Department of Telemedicine and Bioinformatics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland (JL); Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (AAM); Simpson DermCare & Family Medicine, Ammon, ID (IS); Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque (DLS); Dermatology Department, King Albert II Cancer and Hematology Institute, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium (IT); Department of Family Medicine, Millinocket Regional Hospital, Millinocket, ME (MJT); Western Maine Primary Care, Norway (MJT); Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Surgery, Department of Family & Community Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (RPU); Brigham and Women's Health Care Center, Pembroke, MA (AMW); South Shore Medical Center, Norwell, MA (BLW); Redirect Health, Glendale, AZ (RFW); Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (MLW); Department of Dermatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City (DJW); Division of Dermatology, Maine Medical Center, Portland (EVS); Department of Dermatology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (EVS)

Published: February 2023

Background: Primary care providers (PCPs) frequently address dermatologic concerns and perform skin examinations during clinical encounters. For PCPs who evaluate concerning skin lesions, dermoscopy (a noninvasive skin visualization technique) has been shown to increase the sensitivity for skin cancer diagnosis compared with unassisted clinical examinations. Because no formal consensus existed on the fundamental knowledge and skills that PCPs should have with respect to dermoscopy for skin cancer detection, the objective of this study was to develop an expert consensus statement on proficiency standards for PCPs learning or using dermoscopy.

Methods: A 2-phase modified Delphi method was used to develop 2 proficiency standards. In the study's first phase, a focus group of PCPs and dermatologists generated a list of dermoscopic diagnoses and associated features. In the second phase, a larger panel evaluated the proposed list and determined whether each diagnosis was reflective of a foundational or intermediate proficiency or neither.

Results: Of the 35 initial panelists, 5 PCPs were lost to follow-up or withdrew; 30 completed the fifth and last round. The final consensus-based list contained 39 dermoscopic diagnoses and associated features.

Conclusions: This consensus statement will inform the development of PCP-targeted dermoscopy training initiatives designed to support early cancer detection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961604PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.220143R1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

consensus statement
12
proficiency standards
12
expert consensus
8
statement proficiency
8
primary care
8
skin cancer
8
cancer detection
8
dermoscopic diagnoses
8
diagnoses associated
8
pcps
6

Similar Publications

Trends in diagnostic biopsy sample collection approaches for primary bone sarcomas have shifted in the past 2 decades. Although open/incisional biopsies used to be the predominant approach to obtain diagnostic material for Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma, image-guided core needle biopsies have increased in frequency and are safe for patients. These procedures are less invasive and reduce recovery times but have potential limitations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

As rates of obesity rise worldwide, incidence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly referred to as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, is increasing, worsening the burden of healthcare systems. The council of the Federation of International Societies for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (FISPGHAN) identified the topic of MASLD epidemiology, treatment, and prevention as a global priority issue to be addressed by an expert team, with the goal to describe feasible and evidence-based actions that may contribute to reducing MASLD risk. The FISPGHAN member societies nominated experts in the field.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

FSH/LH co-stimulation in Advanced Maternal Age (AMA) and hypo-responder patients - Arabian gulf delphi consensus group.

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)

December 2024

The Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital, Skive, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Skive, Denmark.

Background: In a global effort to assess expert perspectives on the use of recombinant gonadotropins, recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hLH) and recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH), a consensus meeting was held in Dubai. The key aim was to address three critical questions: What are the factors that influence follicle response to gonadotropins? Which categories of patients are most likely to benefit from LH supplementation? And what are the optimal management strategies for these patients?

Methods: A panel of thirty-six experts reviewed and refined the initial statements and references proposed by the Scientific Coordinator. Consensus was defined as agreement or disagreement by more than two-thirds (66%) of the panel members for each statement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To minimise the referral gap to pain psychology, the purpose of this study was to describe clinician-perceived patient suitability for pain psychology referral, develop a referral plan and outline essential elements of a referral conversation via a modified Delphi approach with multidisciplinary paediatric pain providers.

Methods: We employed a three-round modified Delphi approach consulting multidisciplinary paediatric pain providers (n=18) including physicians, psychologists, physical therapists, occupational therapists and nurse practitioners (PT, OT, NP). Based on the responses to an online survey (Round 1), initial statements regarding the pain psychology referral process were developed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) affects up to 90% of patients with cancer receiving long-term opioid-related analgesic therapy, resulting in various potential complications, compromised pain management and decreased quality of life. Laxatives stimulate or facilitate bowel evacuation. Traditional laxatives, such as polyethylene glycol and lactulose, are widely used because of their low cost, easy accessibility and tolerability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!