A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Use of a real-world synthetic control arm for direct comparison of lisocabtagene maraleucel and conventional therapy in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • * The research matched the characteristics of real-world patients to those in the TRANSCEND study to create a balanced analytic cohort.
  • * Results showed that patients treated with liso-cel had significantly better outcomes than those receiving conventional therapies, including higher overall response rates (74% vs 39%), complete response rates (50% vs 24%), and longer median overall survival (23.5 vs 6.8 months).

Article Abstract

This study used a real-world population as a synthetic comparator for the single-arm TRANSCEND NHL 001 study (TRANSCEND; NCT02631044) to evaluate the efficacy of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) compared with conventional (noncellular) therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the real-world study closely matched the enrollment criteria in TRANSCEND. The analytic comparator cohort was created by matching and balancing observed baseline characteristics of real-world patients with those in TRANSCEND using propensity score methodology. Efficacy outcomes comparing liso-cel- ( = 257) and conventional therapy-treated ( = 257) patients, respectively, significantly favored liso-cel: overall response rate (74% vs 39%;  < 0.0001), complete response rate (50% vs 24%;  < 0.0001), median overall survival (23.5 vs 6.8 months;  < 0.0001), and median progression-free survival (3.5 vs 2.2 months;  < 0.0001). These results demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit of liso-cel in patients with third- or later-line R/R LBCL relative to conventional therapies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02631044.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2022.2160200DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lisocabtagene maraleucel
8
large b-cell
8
b-cell lymphoma
8
real-world
4
real-world synthetic
4
synthetic control
4
control arm
4
arm direct
4
direct comparison
4
comparison lisocabtagene
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!