Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: The reactivation of CMV (Cytomegalovirus) in renal transplant recipients may be manifested across a clinical spectrum from asymptomatic viraemia to organ rejection. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the patients who have experienced CMV infection after renal transplantation in the last twelve years, and to assess the efficacy of valacyclovir.
Methodology: Renal transplant recipients' demographic, clinical and laboratory data were evaluated retrospectively between 2006-2018. Valaciclovir was given at the standard prophylaxis dose of 2000 mg/daily. CMV Polymerase Chain reaction (PCR) was performed in 2-week intervals until 1 year after transplantation, and upon any symptoms attributable to CMV.
Results: The entire study group had D+/R+ (donor-positive, recipient-positive) serological status of the CMV virus. 171 (59.2%) patients had only CMV infection, 60 (20.8%) had overall CMV antigen positivity until the end of the follow-up period and 7 (2.4%) patients had CMV disease. Rejection episodes were diagnosed in 31 (10.8%) patients; 20 (64.5%) of those were PCR positive for CMV; mortality rate was 12 (4.2%) but those who died had a non-CMV related disease.
Conclusions: Valaciclovir may be preferred in prophylaxis instead of valganciclovir as we used in our study since valganciclovir has prolonged treatment time, rapid development of drug resistance, drug toxicity and high cost.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3855/jidc.17218 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!