AI Article Synopsis
- The study investigated the effects of spinal anesthesia performed in sitting versus right lateral positions on postspinal headache and intraocular pressure in pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean sections.
- There was a significant occurrence of postdural puncture headaches in the sitting group compared to the lateral group, while intraocular pressure remained unchanged between the two positions.
- The results also indicated that the right lateral position required more attempts for spinal anesthesia administration but showed better outcomes regarding headache incidence.
Article Abstract
Background: Although spinal anesthesia can be applied in different patient positions, the most frequently used positions are sitting and lateral positions. It is known that different patient positions during spinal anesthesia have effects on hemodynamic parameters, postdural puncture headache, and intraocular pressure.
Aim: The study aimed to determine the effect of spinal anesthesia performed in either sitting or right lateral position on postspinal headache and intraocular pressure during elective cesarean section.
Patients And Methods: The study was a randomized controlled study of 104 eligible pregnant women scheduled to undergo elective cesarean section. The women were randomized into two groups. Spinal anesthesia was performed either in the sitting (Group S, n = 53) or the right lateral position (Group L, n = 51). Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded throughout the operation. The participants were informed and monitored for postspinal headaches. Intraocular pressure before and after the operation was measured with Icare PRO. The obtained data were statistically compared between the two groups.
Results: There was no difference between the groups in terms of demographic data. Postdural puncture headache was observed in five patients in Group S and one patient in Group L (P =0.04). There was no difference between the groups in terms of intraocular pressure (P >.05). Heart rate was not significantly different between the groups; however, there was a significant difference in average blood pressure in 1, 5, 30, and 40 minutes (P <.05). The number of trials administered to patients for spinal anesthesia was significantly higher in Group L (P =0.01).
Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia performed in the sitting position for cesarean section caused a higher postspinal headache than in the right lateral position, but the position did not affect intraocular pressure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_401_22 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
A randomized comparative study to prevent supine hypotension syndrome in pregnant females undergoing LSCS after giving spinal anesthesia using a wedge and novel 3D printed uterine displacement device.
Med J Malaysia
January 2025
Department of Anesthesia, Saveetha Medical College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Thandalam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Introduction: Pregnancy induces physiological changes, including alterations in cardiovascular dynamics, predisposing pregnant women to supine hypotension syndrome (SHS) during lower-segment cesarean section (LSCS) under spinal anesthesia. Various methods, including manual displacement of the uterus and use of wedges or cushions, have been proposed to prevent SHS, but their effectiveness remains variable. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a novel 3D-printed uterine displacement device with that of a traditional wedge in preventing SHS during LSCS after spinal anesthesia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe effect of general versus spinal anesthesia on perioperative innate immune function in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
BMC Anesthesiol
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Background: Increasing evidence shows that postoperative innate immune dysregulation is associated with delayed recovery and infectious complications. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of general versus spinal anesthesia on innate immune function during and after total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Methods: This comparative matched cohort study used data from two single-center randomized-controlled trials.
Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Continuous Spinal Anesthesia: A New Approach to an Established Technique.
Medicina (Kaunas)
December 2024
Department of Urology, C.Ur.E.-Centro Urologico Europeo, Hesperia Hospital, 41125 Modena, Italy.
To prove the feasibility of continuous spinal extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (cseRALP) in order to expand the pool of eligible patients. : According to IDEAL guidelines, a consecutive cohort of patients who underwent cseRALP was enrolled. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative data were collected, with particular focus on safety and oncological outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEffect of Anesthetic Modality on Decision-to-Delivery Interval and Maternal-Neonatal Outcomes in Category 2 and 3 Cesarean Deliveries.
J Clin Med
December 2024
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
The optimal anesthetic technique for category 2 and 3 cesarean deliveries remains debated, with concerns about impacts on decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) and perinatal outcomes. This study examined the influence of epidural, spinal, and general anesthesia on DDI, surgical and postoperative complications, and neonatal outcomes. : This prospective cohort study at a tertiary perinatology center enrolled parturient women undergoing category 2 and 3 cesarean deliveries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSpinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in a laboring patient with known cranial arachnoid cyst: a case report.
Int J Obstet Anesth
December 2024
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Arachnoid cysts are fluid-filled cavities that are usually asymptomatic and do not require surgical intervention. However, there are concerns and limited literature on the safety of neuraxial procedure in obstetric patients with cranial arachnoid cysts. We describe the anesthetic management of a pregnant patient with a large arachnoid cyst with mass effect on the cerebellum who presented in labor.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!