Background: Saphenous vein reflux is one of the leading causes of cosmetic and functional disabilities. The recent European Society of Vascular Surgery guidelines recommend endovenous thermal ablation over surgery or sclerotherapy for the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux in patients with chronic venous disease. The aim of this study is to compare different laser fiber tip configurations to outcome regarding technical success and incidence of complications.
Design: A retrospective analysis conducted on patients with documented GSV reflux from 2020 to 2022, comparing baseline parameters and outcome between 2 groups of laser tip fibers used; radial tip and jacketed tip. Primary end point was technical success. Secondary endpoints included incidence of complications in each group, and VCSS score difference in both groups.
Methods: Inclusion criteria entailed patients with primary varicose veins over the age of 18 years, free from malignancy, hematological disorders, and having documented GSV reflux of more than 0.5 sec. All patients had endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the GSV, with complementary foam sclerotherapy or ambulatory phlebectomies as required.
Results: A total of 74 patients underwent EVLA (85 limbs). Fifty-four were done using the radial laser fibers, and 32 using jacketed fibers. Technical success was achieved in 78 limbs (92.9%), 6 limbs (7.1%) had recanalization of the proximal 3 cm of the GSV at 1 month, 2 patients experienced hematomas, and 5 patients had superficial vein thrombosis. There was no significant association between postoperative pain, bruising, recanalization, hematoma formation, and superficial vein thrombosis with different laser fiber tip configurations (P-value 0.95, 0.6, 0.18, 1, and 1, respectively), nor was there any significant difference in VCSS between them (P-value 0.14).Technical success was 90% in the jacketed fibers and 94.1% in the radial fibers group (P-value 0.18).
Conclusions: Neither does laser fiber tip configuration nor its make have a significance on outcome of EVLA of GSV reflux. Both radial and jacketed laser fiber tips exhibit similar safety and efficacy in EVLA.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.045 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
January 2025
Department of Phlebology, Skin and Vein Clinic Oosterwal, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV) reflux after standard endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) vs. flush EVLA (fEVLA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV).
Methods: This was as randomised, single blind, controlled trial (Dutch Trial Register, NL5283).
Ann Vasc Surg
December 2024
Department of Vascular Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Background: To assess the safety and efficacy of flush endovenous laser ablation (fEVLA) in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).
Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a systematic review aiming to identify studies published from inception to March 2024 was conducted. The investigation covered single-arm studies and studies comparing fEVLA to standard EVLA (sEVLA).
Phlebology
December 2024
Department of Vascular Surgery, Texas Vascular and Imaging, Houston, TX, USA.
Objective: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify potential risk factors that lead to increased incidence of intravascular coagulum (IC) observed in clinical practice using polidocanol endovenous microfoam (PEM 1%, Varithena [polidocanol injectable microfoam], Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Mass).
Methods: Patients ( = 119) who received polidocanol endovenous microfoam (PEM) treatment for chronic venous insufficiency between December 2021 and January 2024 at a private outpatient vascular surgery clinic were observed to identify potential risk factors in the development of IC. The patients were stratified into two groups: IC ( = 16) versus non-IC ( = 103).
Phlebology
December 2024
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang-si, Korea.
Objectives: To analyze the distribution of incompetent segments in the great saphenous vein (GSV) in Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological (CEAP) classification C2 limbs to provide a reference for appropriate diagnosis and treatment planning.
Methods: We analyzed the distributions of incompetent segments in the GSVs of the C2 lower extremity undergoing duplex ultrasound from September 2017 to December 2023. The examined segments were the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ), GSV at the proximal thigh, GSV at the knee, and GSV below the knee.
Int Angiol
October 2024
Department of Sports Medicine and Human Nutrition, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Physical Education, Kraków, Poland.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!