Objectives: The surgical Apgar score, calculated using 3 intraoperative variables (blood loss, lowest mean arterial pressure and lowest heart rate), is associated with mortality in cancer surgery. The original score has less applicability in lung cancer surgery; therefore, we innovated the modified pulmonary surgical Apgar score with additional intraoperative oxygen saturation representing pulmonary parenchymal damage and cardiopulmonary dynamics.
Methods: We retrospectively analysed the data of 691 patients who underwent surgery for primary lung cancer between 2015 and 2019 at a single institute. We analysed the utility of the pulmonary surgical Apgar score compared with the original surgical Apgar score.
Results: Postoperative complications were observed in 57 (8.2%) and 7 (1.0%) of the 691 patients who were stratified as grade ≥III and V, respectively, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. We compared the fitness of the score in predicting postoperative complications; the calculated c-index (0.622) was slightly higher than the original c-index (0.604; P = 0.398). Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on their scores as follows: 0-6 points (n = 59), 7-9 points (n = 420) and 10-12 points (n = 212). Univariable and multivariable analyses demonstrated that a lower score was an independent negative risk factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio 3.53; P = 0.02). Patients with lower scores had a considerably poor 5-year overall survival (64.6%) (P = 0.07).
Conclusions: The pulmonary surgical Apgar score predicts postoperative complications and long-term survival in patients with lung cancer undergoing surgery and may be utilized for postoperative management.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezad036 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!