Higher diagnostic yield of 18F-FDG PET in inflammation of unknown origin compared to fever of unknown origin.

Objective: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) is an important imaging technique in the workup of fever of unknown origin (FUO) and inflammation of unknown origin (IUO). Studies comparing the diagnostic yield of 18F-FDG PET between both entities are lacking.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of FUO/IUO patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET between 2000 and 2019 in the University Hospitals of Leuven (Belgium). 18F-FDG PET images were assessed for accuracy and contribution towards the final diagnosis. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between meeting FUO or IUO criteria and diagnostic contribution of 18F-FDG PET with and without adjustment for confounders.

Results: Out of 604 patients, 439 (73%, mean age 56 years, 43% female) underwent 18F-FDG PET imaging, including 349 (79%) classified as FUO and 90 (21%) as IUO. Noninfectious inflammatory disorders were significantly more frequent in the IUO group (37% versus 25%; P = 0.03). 18F-FDG PET imaging had a sensitivity of 93% (89-96%), a specificity of 35% (29-42%), and made a positive contribution to the final diagnosis in 25% (21-29%) of cases. IUO was significantly associated with contributive 18F-FDG PET imaging compared to FUO (aOR 2.21 [95% CI 1.31-3.72]; P = 0.003). Among those with contributive 18F-FDG PET imaging, giant cell arteritis (IUO 25% versus FUO 12%) and polymyalgia rheumatica (IUO 17% versus FUO 1%) were numerically more frequent in the IUO group.

Conclusion: The diagnostic contribution of 18F-FDG PET was higher among those with IUO, most likely due to differences in diagnostic spectrum.