Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MRMP) infection is increasing worldwide. However, its clinical significance is still uncertain.
Methods: The data of the Laboratory Medicine Department of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in northern Taiwan was searched for children with molecular confirmed macrolide-susceptible Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MSMP) and MRMP infections between January 2011 and December 2018. The clinical features, laboratory data, and chest image presentations were compared between patients with MRMP and MSMP infections and between patients with good and poor macrolide response, respectively.
Results: Records from 158 patients were recovered. Of the enrolled patients 34 (22%) suffered MRMP infection, 27 (17%) had pleural effusions, and 47 (32%) had poor macrolide response. The macrolide resistance rate was 12% in 2011, 20% between 2015 and 2016, and 50% between 2017 and 2018, respectively. Other than a poor macrolide response, the MRMP and MSMP infections are clinically indistinguishable. The presence of pleural effusion and MRMP infections were found to be independently associated with a poor macrolide response, with odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 14.3 (4.9-42.0) and 14.6 (5.4-40), respectively. The macrolide resistance rate of the patients with a poor macrolide response was 49% and 18% among all the patients enrolled and the patients with a pleural effusion, respectively.
Conclusion: The macrolide resistance rate had possibly increased in recent years in Taiwan and should be continuously monitored. In addition, the macrolide response could be misleading in predicting a macrolide resistance especially for the patients with a pleural effusion.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2023.01.010 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!