AI Article Synopsis

  • Epinephrine is commonly used in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation, but the evidence on its effectiveness is inconsistent.
  • A systematic review evaluated the safety and efficacy of different epinephrine doses and combinations compared to placebo in improving outcomes after OHCA.
  • The study found that while all forms of epinephrine increased return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital admission, there was no significant impact on long-term survival or functional outcomes, except standard-dose epinephrine showed some benefit for patients with nonshockable rhythms.

Article Abstract

Background: Epinephrine is the most commonly used drug in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation, but evidence supporting its efficacy is mixed.

Research Question: What are the comparative efficacy and safety of standard dose epinephrine, high-dose epinephrine, epinephrine plus vasopressin, and placebo or no treatment in improving outcomes after OHCA?

Study Design And Methods: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, we searched six databases from inception through June 2022 for randomized controlled trials evaluating epinephrine use during OHCA resuscitation. We performed frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis and present ORs and 95% CIs. We used the the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to rate the certainty of evidence. Outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital admission, survival to discharge, and survival with good functional outcome.

Results: We included 18 trials (21,594 patients). Compared with placebo or no treatment, high-dose epinephrine (OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 3.68-4.97), standard-dose epinephrine (OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 3.32-4.10), and epinephrine plus vasopressin (OR, 3.54; 95% CI, 2.94-4.26) all increased ROSC. High-dose epinephrine (OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 2.97-4.20), standard-dose epinephrine (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 2.66-3.38), and epinephrine plus vasopressin (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 2.27-3.44) all increased survival to hospital admission as compared with placebo or no treatment. However, none of these agents may increase survival to discharge or survival with good functional outcome as compared with placebo or no treatment. Compared with placebo or no treatment, standard-dose epinephrine improved survival to discharge among patients with nonshockable rhythm (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.21-3.63), but not in those with shockable rhythm (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.39-1.85).

Interpretation: Use of standard-dose epinephrine, high-dose epinephrine, and epinephrine plus vasopressin increases ROSC and survival to hospital admission, but may not improve survival to discharge or functional outcome. Standard-dose epinephrine improved survival to discharge among patients with nonshockable rhythm, but not those with shockable rhythm.

Trial Registry: Center for Open Science: https://osf.io/arxwq.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2023.01.033DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

placebo treatment
20
survival discharge
20
standard-dose epinephrine
20
epinephrine
17
high-dose epinephrine
16
epinephrine vasopressin
16
compared placebo
16
network meta-analysis
12
survival hospital
12
hospital admission
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!