Measuring Success in Headache Surgery: A Comparison of Different Outcomes Measures.

Background: Studies of migraine surgery have relied on quantitative, patient-reported measures like the Migraine Headache Index (MHI) and validated surveys to study the outcomes and impact of headache surgery. It is unclear whether a single metric or a combination of outcomes assessments is best suited to do so.

Methods: All patients who underwent headache surgery had an MHI calculated and completed the Headache Impact Test, the Migraine Disability Assessment Test, the Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, and an institutional ad hoc survey preoperatively and postoperatively.

Results: Twenty-seven patients (79%) experienced greater than or equal to 50% MHI reduction. MHI decreased significantly from a median of 210 preoperatively to 12.5 postoperatively (85%; P < 0.0001). Headache Impact Test scores improved from 67 to 61 (14%; P < 0.0001). Migraine Disability Assessment Test scores improved from 57 to 20 (67%; P = 0.0022). The Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire demonstrated improvement in quality-of-life scores within all three of its domains ( P < 0.0001). The authors' ad hoc survey demonstrated that participants "strongly agreed" that (1) surgery helped their symptoms, (2) they would choose surgery again, and (3) they would recommend headache surgery to others.

Conclusions: Regardless of how one measures it, headache surgery is effective. The authors demonstrate that surgery significantly improves patients' quality of life and decreases the effect of headaches on patients' functioning, but headaches can still be present to a substantial degree. The extent of improvement in migraine burden and quality of life in these patients may exceed the amount of improvement demonstrated by current measures.