Exploring the Study of Simulation as a Continuing Professional Development Strategy for Physicians.

J Contin Educ Health Prof

Dr. Tavares: Assistant Professor and Scientist, Wilson Centre for Health Professions Education, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and York Region Paramedic and Senior Services, Community Health Services Department, Regional Municipality of York, Newmarket Ontario, Canada. Dr. Piquette: Assistant Professor, Inter-Department Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Staff Physician, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Centre Researcher, The Wilson Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Ms. Luong: Research Associate II, KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Chiu: Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Department of Innovation in Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Dyte: Clinical Lecturer and Anesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Dr. Fraser: Clinical Professor of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Dr. Clark: Clinical Associate Professor of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Published: December 2022

Introduction: Practicing physicians have the responsibility to engage in lifelong learning. Although simulation is an effective experiential educational strategy, physicians seldom select it for continuing professional development (CPD) for reasons that are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to explore existing evidence on simulation-based CPD and the factors influencing physicians' engagement in simulation-based CPD.

Methods: A scoping review of the literature on simulation-based CPD included MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases. Studies involving the use of simulation for practicing physicians' CPD were included. Information related to motivations for participating in simulation-based CPD, study objectives, research question(s), rationale(s), reasons for using simulation, and simulation features was abstracted.

Results: The search yielded 8609 articles, with 6906 articles undergoing title and abstract screening after duplicate removal. Six hundred sixty-one articles underwent full-text screening. Two hundred twenty-five studies (1993-2021) were reviewed for data abstraction. Only four studies explored physicians' motivations directly, while 31 studies described incentives or strategies used to enroll physicians in studies on simulation-based CPD. Most studies focused on leveraging or demonstrating the utility of simulation for CPD. Limited evidence suggests that psychological safety, direct relevance to clinical practice, and familiarity with simulation may promote future engagement.

Discussion: Although simulation is an effective experiential educational method, factors explaining its uptake by physicians as a CPD strategy are unclear. Additional evidence of simulation effectiveness may fail to convince physicians to participate in simulation-based CPD unless personal, social, educational, or contextual factors that shape physicians' motivations and choices to engage in simulation-based CPD are explored.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000470DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

simulation-based cpd
24
cpd
10
simulation
9
continuing professional
8
professional development
8
strategy physicians
8
simulation effective
8
effective experiential
8
experiential educational
8
cpd included
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!