Dislocation Rates of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Prior Lumbar Spine Fusion and Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease With and Without Utilization of Dual Mobility Cups: An American Joint Replacement Registry Study.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg

From the University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation (Nessler), University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, Department of Orthopedics Adult Reconstruction Program (Malkani), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Chicago, IL (Yep and Mullen), and Department of Orthopedics & Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Adult Reconstruction Program, Madison, WI (Illgen).

Published: March 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Patients with a history of lumbar spine fusion (LSF) face higher dislocation risks after total hip arthroplasty (THA), prompting a study to analyze dislocation rates between dual mobility (DM) and non-DM constructs.
  • A total of 15,572 patients were evaluated, revealing that the 90-day dislocation rates were significantly lower for DM constructs (0.68%) compared to non-DM constructs (1.17%).
  • The findings suggest that utilizing DM constructs in high-risk patients with stiff spines can help reduce the likelihood of hip dislocation after THA, indicating a potential benefit for these individuals.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a previous history of lumbar spine fusion (LSF) are at increased risk of dislocation. The purpose of this study was to compare the 90-day and 1-year dislocation rates of patients with LSF or lumbar degenerative disk disease who underwent primary THA with and without dual mobility (DM) constructs.

Methods: An American Joint Replacement Registry data set of patients aged 65 years and older undergoing primary THA with minimum 1-year follow-up with a history of prior LSF or a diagnosis of lumbar degenerative disk disease was created. DM status was identified, and dislocation and all-cause revision at 90 days and 1 year were assessed.

Results: A total of 15,572 patients met study criteria. The overall dislocation rates for the non-DM and DM groups were 1.17% and 0.68%, respectively, at 90 days, and 1.68% and 0.91%, respectively, at 1 year ( P = 0.005). The odds of 90-day (OR = 0.578, [ P = 0.0328]) and 1-year (OR = 0.534, [ P = 0.0044]) dislocation were significantly less with DM constructs, compared with non-DM constructs. No statistically significant difference was observed in revision rates between groups.

Discussion: This large registry-based study identified a reduced risk of dislocation in patients at risk for spinal stiffness when a DM compared with non-DM construct was used in primary THA at 90-day and 1-year follow-up intervals. Our data support the use of DM constructs in high-risk patients with stiff spines and altered spinopelvic mobility as a promising option to mitigate the risk of postoperative hip instability after primary THA.

Levels Of Evidence: Level III. Therapeutic retrospective cohort.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00767DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dislocation rates
12
lumbar degenerative
12
degenerative disk
12
disk disease
12
primary tha
12
primary total
8
total hip
8
hip arthroplasty
8
lumbar spine
8
spine fusion
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!