A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Fate of Sensation in Noninnervated Perforator Free Flaps in the Lower Extremity. | LitMetric

Background: The recovery of sensation for noninnervated perforator flaps is not well understood. This prospective study aims to evaluate the quality, tendency, and related factors for recovery of sensation.

Methods: A total of 187 patients over a 6-year period were evaluated at intervals of 3, 6, 12, and +24 months for demographic data and sensory tests [Semmes-Weinstein (SW) monofilament test, static two-point discrimination, temperature, and pain] on peripheral and central regions of the flap. Further detailed assessment using the SW monofilament test was made according to flap thickness, size, type, and recipient sites. Factors correlated to poor recovery were evaluated.

Results: Among the flaps tested, the 5.07 SW monofilament test revealed that the peripheral flap sensory recovery was achieved in 72% at +24 months with a significantly increasing linear trend ( P < 0.001). However, the central recovery was noted in only 26% to 28%. The two-point discrimination was achieved in 21% without a significant trend, whereas temperature and pain showed significant improvement, achieving 49% and 64% on the peripheral region and 22% and 31% for the central region, respectively. The flap thickness, size, type, and recipient sites did not exert significance. Only smoking was a significant factor, with 13 times higher odds of hindering sensory recovery.

Conclusions: The SW monofilament test, temperature, and pain sensation on the periphery of the flap showed increasing trend of recovery over the +24 months. Among the various factors, only smoking attenuated recovery. Understanding the fate of sensory recovery in noninnervated perforator flaps will allow the surgeons to further customize the reconstruction based on the defect and maximize efficiency.

Clinical Question/level Of Evidence: Risk, III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010180DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

monofilament test
16
noninnervated perforator
12
+24 months
12
sensation noninnervated
8
recovery
8
perforator flaps
8
two-point discrimination
8
flap thickness
8
thickness size
8
size type
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!