Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Few articles in literature describe the potential usefulness of 18 F-choline PET/CT and particularly 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in imaging of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We report a unique comparison in literature between the 2 radiotracers in a patient who underwent left nephrectomy with diagnosis of ccRCC, grade 3. 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT confirmed its emerging role in imaging ccRCC, as the incidentally detected renal neoplasm showed a significant higher uptake in comparison to 18 F-choline PET/CT, inducing surgical indication.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000004515 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!